2022
DOI: 10.1037/per0000528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay discounting and narcissism: A meta-analysis with implications for narcissistic personality disorder.

Abstract: Several psychiatric conditions (e.g., substance use, mood, and personality disorders) are characterized, in part, by greater delay discounting (DD)-a decision-making bias in the direction of preferring smaller, more immediate over larger, delayed rewards. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is highly comorbid with substance use, mood, and other personality disorders, suggesting that DD may be a process underpinning risk for NPD as well. This meta-analysis examined associations between DD and theoretically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although delay discounting is relevant across many important social outcomes, research has primarily focused on positive rewards, most typically hypothetical monetary rewards (for reviews see, e.g., Cheng et al, 2021; Coleman et al, 2022; Johnson et al, 2020; Johnson et al, 2021; Odum et al, 2020; Seaman et al, 2022; Strickland et al, 2021; Weinsztok et al, 2021). Findings tend to be consistent across research using real and hypothetical monetary rewards (Dixon et al, 2013; Johnson & Bickel, 2002; Lagorio & Madden, 2005; Locey et al, 2011; Madden et al, 2003; Madden et al, 2004; Matusiewicz et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although delay discounting is relevant across many important social outcomes, research has primarily focused on positive rewards, most typically hypothetical monetary rewards (for reviews see, e.g., Cheng et al, 2021; Coleman et al, 2022; Johnson et al, 2020; Johnson et al, 2021; Odum et al, 2020; Seaman et al, 2022; Strickland et al, 2021; Weinsztok et al, 2021). Findings tend to be consistent across research using real and hypothetical monetary rewards (Dixon et al, 2013; Johnson & Bickel, 2002; Lagorio & Madden, 2005; Locey et al, 2011; Madden et al, 2003; Madden et al, 2004; Matusiewicz et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%