2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2682499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay Mitigation in Offloaded Cloud Controllers in Industrial IoT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
28
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed lower performance using the cloud-based PLC compared to a local PLC, due to network-induced delays, particularly as real-time computation demands became more stringent. Similar conclusions have been reached by Hegazy and Hefeeda [4], Esen et al [5], Kaneko and Ito [9], Vick et al [10], Abdelaal et al [14], and Mubeen et al [15] in their tests of cloud-based controllers on various real-time control applications. Solutions proposed to counter the effects of delays and other QoS issues in CaaS include implementation of real-time controllers using Private Clouds [11] or in the Fog [15], both involving the use of local area networks (LAN) as opposed to wide area networks (WAN) to reduce delays.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Their results showed lower performance using the cloud-based PLC compared to a local PLC, due to network-induced delays, particularly as real-time computation demands became more stringent. Similar conclusions have been reached by Hegazy and Hefeeda [4], Esen et al [5], Kaneko and Ito [9], Vick et al [10], Abdelaal et al [14], and Mubeen et al [15] in their tests of cloud-based controllers on various real-time control applications. Solutions proposed to counter the effects of delays and other QoS issues in CaaS include implementation of real-time controllers using Private Clouds [11] or in the Fog [15], both involving the use of local area networks (LAN) as opposed to wide area networks (WAN) to reduce delays.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Similar conclusions have been reached by Hegazy and Hefeeda [4], Esen et al [5], Kaneko and Ito [9], Vick et al [10], Abdelaal et al [14], and Mubeen et al [15] in their tests of cloud-based controllers on various real-time control applications. Solutions proposed to counter the effects of delays and other QoS issues in CaaS include implementation of real-time controllers using Private Clouds [11] or in the Fog [15], both involving the use of local area networks (LAN) as opposed to wide area networks (WAN) to reduce delays. Other solutions involve the use of redundant control architectures [4,9,16] and various forms of delay compensation techniques [4,5,10,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, in CaaS, a variety of control algorithms could be offered in an "app marketplace", where they are accessed if and when needed by a given device. For more details on the various benefits of CaaS, see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%