1994
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay of Reinforcement Effects without Goal-Box Confinement

Abstract: 24 male albino rats were randomly assigned to one of three groups, immediate reinforcement, moderate delay, or long delay. Group Immediate ( n = 8) received food reinforcement immediately upon entering the goal box and were then placed in a waiting cage. For Group Moderate Delay ( n = 8), goal-box confinement was eliminated by placement in a waiting cage rather than confinement in the goal box. Group Long Delay ( n = 8) also had goal-box confinement eliminated with placement in a waiting cage for the 30-sec. d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These preceding expectancies compel restraints on adaptive learning, especially when reinforcement events (positive outcomes or consequences) are deferred in the presence of responses or cues that signal such consequences (Bolles, 1972, p. 405). Furthermore, studies confirm that dimensions of behavior other than rate of learning are dependent on this temporal effect, including shorter response latencies following acquisition trials in rats given immediate (versus delayed) reinforcement (e.g., Calef, Haupt, & Choban, 1994).…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Consequences Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These preceding expectancies compel restraints on adaptive learning, especially when reinforcement events (positive outcomes or consequences) are deferred in the presence of responses or cues that signal such consequences (Bolles, 1972, p. 405). Furthermore, studies confirm that dimensions of behavior other than rate of learning are dependent on this temporal effect, including shorter response latencies following acquisition trials in rats given immediate (versus delayed) reinforcement (e.g., Calef, Haupt, & Choban, 1994).…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Consequences Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 79%