Delayed auditory feedback effects during reading and conversation tasks: Gender differences in fluent adults

Corey, David M.; Cuddapah, Vishnu Anand

doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2008.12.001

Cited by 21 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Earlier studies of the effects of delayed auditory feedback in fluent speakers have reported an increase in errors and disfluencies (e.g., Perkins, Bell, Johnson, & Stochs, 1979; Howell & Archer, 1984; Corey & Cuddapah, 2008; Lincoln, Packman, Onslow, & Jones, 2010). There have been limited investigations of the effects of delayed auditory feedback on speech movement kinematics (Sussman & Smith, 1971; Mochida, et al , 2010; Cai, et al , 2011).…”

Section: Purposes Of the Present Studymentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Earlier studies of delayed auditory feedback have reported some sex-based differences in behavioral (Fukawa, Yoshioka, Ozawa, & Yoshida, 1988; Corey & Cuddapah, 2008) and electrophysiological responses (e.g., Swink & Stuart, 2012). For instance, Corey and Cuddapah (2008) investigated the effects of delayed feedback in the speech of men and women in reading and conversation.…”

Section: Purposes Of the Present Studymentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Some of the known effects include decrease in speech rate, increase in speech intensity and pitch, prolongation of vowels, misarticulations, and disfluencies (Goldiamond, 1965; Perkins, Bell, Johnson, & Stochs, 1979; Howell & Archer, 1984). Factors such as age, sex of individual, and task complexity, are known to modulate the influence of delayed feedback (e.g., Siegel, Fehst, Garber, & Pick, 1980; Corey & Cuddapah, 2008). However, there are only a limited number of studies of the effects of delayed feedback on the kinematics of ongoing speech movement (e.g., Mochida, Gomi, & Kashino, 2010; Cai, Gosh, Guenther, & Perkell, 2011).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Speech Kinematics in Fluent Speakers

Sasisekaran

2012

Percept Mot Skills

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary The effects of delayed auditory feedback on behavioral responses and speech kinematics were investigated. Participants were 10 males (M age = 22.2, SD = 3.7) and 10 females (M age = 20.5, SD = 2.2). Participants were required to repeat short (six-syllable) and longer (11-syllable) non-words in a reading task. Speech errors, lip movement variability, and movement duration of labial trajectories under delayed feedback were compared to effects under gated speech feedback and a control or synchronous auditory feedback condition. Repeated measures analysis indicated lower percent of correct productions, higher variability and slower duration of lip movements in the delayed feedback condition compared to the gated feedback and control conditions. Implications for auditory feedback of movement control in continuous speech and for theories of delayed auditory feedback that attribute a role to movements are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Purposes Of the Present Studymentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Purposes Of the Present Studymentioning

confidence: 97%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Speech Kinematics in Fluent Speakers

Sasisekaran

2012

Percept Mot Skills

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We note that although our design required participants to produce sequences from memory and thus required discarding some trials due to these ambiguous misremember errors, it eliminates uncontrolled variables related to how participants use visual inputs when stimuli can be directly read. Further, the effects of DAF have been shown to differ under reading and conversational speech conditions (e.g., Corey and Cuddapah, 2008), so to focus our analysis exclusively on speech motor mechanisms, we opted to remove the visual aspect of this task during the experimental manipulation.…”

Section: Auditory-perceptual Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Kinematic Analysis of Speech Sound Sequencing Errors Induced by Delayed Auditory Feedback

Cler

Lee

Mittelman

et al. 2017

J Speech Lang Hear Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Delayed auditory feedback (DAF) causes speakers to become disfluent and make phonological errors. Methods for assessing the kinematics of speech errors are lacking, with most DAF studies relying on auditory perceptual analyses, which may be problematic, as errors judged to be categorical may actually represent blends of sounds or articulatory errors. Method Eight typical speakers produced nonsense syllable sequences under normal and DAF (200 ms). Lip and tongue kinematics were captured with electromagnetic articulography. Time-locked acoustic recordings were transcribed, and the kinematics of utterances with and without perceived errors were analyzed with existing and novel quantitative methods. Results New multivariate measures showed that for 5 participants, kinematic variability for productions perceived to be error free was significantly increased under delay; these results were validated by using the spatiotemporal index measure. Analysis of error trials revealed both typical productions of a nontarget syllable and productions with articulatory kinematics that incorporated aspects of both the target and the perceived utterance. Conclusions This study is among the first to characterize articulatory changes under DAF and provides evidence for different classes of speech errors, which may not be perceptually salient. New methods were developed that may aid visualization and analysis of large kinematic data sets. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5103067

show abstract

“…Regarding the question: Who benefits more from DAF? Corey & Cuddapah (2008) recommend that individual differences in attention control may help us understand gender difference in DAF effects and possibly in DS prevalence as well. Such recommendation was suggested due to the fact that DAF found to be the most disruptive to subsequent calls when the delay was 25 millisecond (ms.).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overcoming Stuttering Using Delayed Auditory Feedback (DAF): A Case Study

Al-Yaari¹,

Hammadi²,

AyiedAlyami³

et al. 2013

IJELE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: With the tremendous improvements in technology in producing new techniques to overcome stuttering, many assumptions were stated from different aspects. Aims:To in/validate some of the stuttering assumptions, the present study attempts to investigate the role played by Delayed Auditory Feedback (DAF) device in overcoming stuttering and improving stutterers' fluency. Methods:A client study of MO, a 23-year old bilingual student who exhibits stuttering and language delay due to psychological factors. An intensive therapeutic treatment which continued for 20 months has been given to the client at hand. The client had to practice (in English) ten(10) alphabetical characters, twenty (20) words (10 nouns and 10 verbs), and ten (10)sentences for four continuous hours every day. Results:The analyses of the client's utterances throughout five entire sessions show that his rate of speech became slower if not almost normal across increases in DAF. The findings reveal that simultaneous application of both treatments on speaking through DAF was successful in reducing the rate of stuttering in the speech of the client under investigation. It all depends on age, determination, the level of severity, and the way he/she uses DAF. These findings account for the results that support many theories of stuttering including Phonemic Content Theory, Covert Repair Hypothesis (CRH) and Johnson's theory. Taken together, these results weigh strongly against the hypothesis stated that stutterers have generally high levels of emotional reactivity (e.g., Brutten/Shoemaker, 1967).

show abstract

Delayed auditory feedback effects during reading and conversation tasks: Gender differences in fluent adults

Cited by 21 publications

References 54 publications

Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Speech Kinematics in Fluent Speakers

Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Speech Kinematics in Fluent Speakers

Kinematic Analysis of Speech Sound Sequencing Errors Induced by Delayed Auditory Feedback

Overcoming Stuttering Using Delayed Auditory Feedback (DAF): A Case Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About