Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
IntroductionCortico‐cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) were described as reproducible during trains of single‐pulse electrical stimulations (SPES). Still, few studies described a variability of CCEPs that was higher within the epileptogenic zone (EZ). This study aimed at characterizing the relationship of CCEP variability with the occurrence of interictal/ictal epileptiform discharges at the temporal vicinity of the stimulation, but not during the stimulation, by effective connectivity modifications.MethodsWe retrospectively included 20 patients who underwent SPES during their stereo‐electroencephalography (SEEG). We analyzed the variability of CCEPs by using the post‐stimulation time course of intertrial standard deviation (amplitude) and the timing of peak amplitude signal of CCEP epochs (latency). Values were corrected for the Euclidian distance between stimulating/recording electrodes. Receiver operating characteristics curves were used to assess the relationship with the EZ. The link between CCEP variability and interictal discharges occurrence, seizure frequency prior to the SEEG recording, and number of seizures during SEEG recording was assessed with Spearman's correlations.ResultsA relationship was demonstrated between the EZ and both the distance‐corrected latency variation (area under the curve (AUC): 0.73–0.74) and the distance‐corrected amplitude variation (AUC: 0.71–0.72) and both were related with the occurrence of seizures.ConclusionSeizures before/during SEEG impact the dynamics of effective connectivity within the epileptogenic network by reducing the variability of CCEP latency/amplitude when the seizure frequency increases. It suggests a strengthening of the epileptogenic network with the occurrence of many seizures. These findings stress the importance of early epilepsy surgery at a time when the network organization has not yet been complete.
IntroductionCortico‐cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) were described as reproducible during trains of single‐pulse electrical stimulations (SPES). Still, few studies described a variability of CCEPs that was higher within the epileptogenic zone (EZ). This study aimed at characterizing the relationship of CCEP variability with the occurrence of interictal/ictal epileptiform discharges at the temporal vicinity of the stimulation, but not during the stimulation, by effective connectivity modifications.MethodsWe retrospectively included 20 patients who underwent SPES during their stereo‐electroencephalography (SEEG). We analyzed the variability of CCEPs by using the post‐stimulation time course of intertrial standard deviation (amplitude) and the timing of peak amplitude signal of CCEP epochs (latency). Values were corrected for the Euclidian distance between stimulating/recording electrodes. Receiver operating characteristics curves were used to assess the relationship with the EZ. The link between CCEP variability and interictal discharges occurrence, seizure frequency prior to the SEEG recording, and number of seizures during SEEG recording was assessed with Spearman's correlations.ResultsA relationship was demonstrated between the EZ and both the distance‐corrected latency variation (area under the curve (AUC): 0.73–0.74) and the distance‐corrected amplitude variation (AUC: 0.71–0.72) and both were related with the occurrence of seizures.ConclusionSeizures before/during SEEG impact the dynamics of effective connectivity within the epileptogenic network by reducing the variability of CCEP latency/amplitude when the seizure frequency increases. It suggests a strengthening of the epileptogenic network with the occurrence of many seizures. These findings stress the importance of early epilepsy surgery at a time when the network organization has not yet been complete.
ObjectiveIntracranial single‐pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) can elicit cortico‐cortical evoked potentials. Their investigation with intracranial EEG is biased by the limited number and selected location of electrodes, which could be circumvented by simultaneous non‐invasive whole‐scalp recording. This study aimed at investigating the ability of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to characterize cortico‐cortical evoked fields (CCEFs) and effective connectivity between the epileptogenic zone (EZ) and non‐epileptogenic zone (i.e., non‐involved [NIZ]).MethodsA total of 301 SPES trains (at 0.9 Hz during 120 s) were performed in 10 patients with refractory focal epilepsy. MEG signals were denoised, epoched, averaged, and decomposed using independent component analysis. Significant response deflections and significant source generators were detected. Peak latency/amplitude were compared between each different cortical/subcortical structure of the NIZ containing more than five SPES, and then between the EZ and corresponding brain structures in the NIZ.ResultsMEG detected and localized polymorphic/polyphasic CCEFs, including one to eight significant consecutive deflections. The latency and amplitude of CCEFs within the NIZ differed significantly depending on the stimulated brain structure. Compared with the corresponding NIZ, SPES within the extratemporal EZ demonstrated delayed CCEF latency, whereas SPES within the temporal EZ showed decreased CCEF amplitude. SPES within the EZ elicited a significantly higher rate of CCEFs within the stimulated lobe compared with those within the NIZ.SignificanceThis study reveals polymorphic CCEFs with complex spatiotemporal dynamics both within the NIZ and EZ. It highlights significant differences in effective connectivity of the epileptogenic network. These cortico‐cortical evoked responses could thus contribute to increasing the yield of intracranial recordings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.