“…Due to the small number of studies and the inability to separate TL approaches, all skull‐base approaches were included in the comparison. We included Kveton et al (109 patients, 1 CSF leak, 3 wound infections, no TL approaches), Poetker et al (76 patients, 0 CSF leaks, 2 infections, fewer than 43 TL approaches), and Kerr et al (177 patients, 0 CSF leaks, 13 infections, various approaches) . We compared these studies with our cohort using Bayesian analysis with prior probabilities set to a uniform distribution of possible complication rates between 0% and 100% (beta distribution α= 1, β= 1).…”