2023
DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis is associated with a high complication rate in men with a history of ischemic priapism

Abstract: Background Corporal fibrosis is known to result from prolonged priapism; however, the impact of the timing of penile prosthesis placement after priapism on complication rates is poorly understood. Aim We sought to evaluate the impact of timing of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement on complications in men with a history of ischemic priapism. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcomes of penile prostheses implantation are summarized in Table 1 . Most of the studies describe the outcomes of an early PP implant; however, Durazi et al describe the results in a delayed approach to PP implant, and some of the papers do not specify the time when the prosthesis was implanted (early or delayed) ( 9 - 12 , 14 ). Of these selected papers, five compare the outcomes of early placement (EP) vs. delayed placement (DP) PP implants after priapism ( 8 - 11 , 26 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The outcomes of penile prostheses implantation are summarized in Table 1 . Most of the studies describe the outcomes of an early PP implant; however, Durazi et al describe the results in a delayed approach to PP implant, and some of the papers do not specify the time when the prosthesis was implanted (early or delayed) ( 9 - 12 , 14 ). Of these selected papers, five compare the outcomes of early placement (EP) vs. delayed placement (DP) PP implants after priapism ( 8 - 11 , 26 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, comparing outcomes and complication rates across these studies becomes challenging due to the substantial variations in the defined timelines. According to multiple urologic guidelines, implantation is only recommended when other less invasive treatments, like phosphodiesterase inhibitors and intracavernosal injections, have proven ineffective in treating priapism ( 12 , 13 ). We herein provide a systematic review that aims to evaluate PP in the management of priapism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%