2000
DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200008000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed Separation of the Capital Femoral Epiphysis After an Ipsilateral Transcervical Fracture of the Femoral Neck

Abstract: A displaced transcervical fracture of the femoral neck in a three-year-eight-month-old boy was fixed with two screws, which did not cross the growth plate. When he resumed walking five weeks after the injury, a delayed separation of the capital femoral epiphysis occurred. The displaced epiphysis was reduced and fixed with three unthreaded pins. In spite of disruption of the femoral neck at two sites, avascular necrosis of the femoral head did not occur. This was confirmed by two sequential isotope scans. Delay… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have been able to locate only two reports of this association. 5,12 The interval between the initial injury and the epiphyseal separation in the current case was only 5 weeks, and the physeal separation occurred immediately after the child resumed walking. This suggests that the causative factor was not prolonged repetitive loading of an abnormally inclined growth plate seen in the previously reported patient with the malunited femoral neck fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have been able to locate only two reports of this association. 5,12 The interval between the initial injury and the epiphyseal separation in the current case was only 5 weeks, and the physeal separation occurred immediately after the child resumed walking. This suggests that the causative factor was not prolonged repetitive loading of an abnormally inclined growth plate seen in the previously reported patient with the malunited femoral neck fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…[8][9][10][11] In the literature, delayed separation of the capital femoral epiphysis after a fracture of the femoral neck is very uncommon. 5,12 We report one such case, which went on to heal with evidence of avascular necrosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We reviewed the reports of five other patients who developed SCFE after surgical treatment of a femoral neck fracture [5,8,9,15,21] (Table 1); to our knowledge, these represent all of the published examples of SCFE after a surgically treated proximal femoral fracture. Along with our two patients, mean age of all seven patients was 8.9 years (range, 3.6-12 years; boys, 8.9 years; girls, 9 years).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to prove a direct causal relationship because most children with femoral neck fracture do not have the complication of SCFE, and only seven cases have been reported to date that we know of, including the two we describe here. Nonetheless, in reviewing the treatment of the seven patients, some associations may plausibly be made, which we discuss in the subsequent section; these associations may include implant irritation, premature initiation of weightbearing, improper postoperative immobilization, delayed union or nonunion, coxa vara, and AVN [5,8,9,15,21]. One other possible associated factor is excessive retroversion with fixation for the fracture.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation