Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS/international Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2465529.2465759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delays and mixing times in random-access networks

Abstract: We explore the achievable delay performance in wireless random-access networks. While relatively simple and inherently distributed in nature, suitably designed backlogbased random-access schemes provide the striking capability to match the optimal throughput performance of centralized scheduling mechanisms. The specific type of activation rules for which throughput optimality has been established, may however yield excessive backlogs and delays.Motivated by that issue, we examine whether the poor delay perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the specific case of an L × L grid, the fluid-limit results in [24] suggest that maximum stability would actually be maintained as long as the function p(q) decays no faster than q −2/L 2 . The lower bounds in [23] then indicate that the delays grow as (1 − ρ) −L 2 /2 , which is still faster than the bounds we obtained for fixed back-off probabilities. In order for the lower bounds for queue-based back-off probabilities in [23] to match the lower bounds in the present paper for fixed back-off probabilities, the function p(q) should decay as q −1/L , but it is not clear whether maximum stability would remain guaranteed in that case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the specific case of an L × L grid, the fluid-limit results in [24] suggest that maximum stability would actually be maintained as long as the function p(q) decays no faster than q −2/L 2 . The lower bounds in [23] then indicate that the delays grow as (1 − ρ) −L 2 /2 , which is still faster than the bounds we obtained for fixed back-off probabilities. In order for the lower bounds for queue-based back-off probabilities in [23] to match the lower bounds in the present paper for fixed back-off probabilities, the function p(q) should decay as q −1/L , but it is not clear whether maximum stability would remain guaranteed in that case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Remarkably, for suitable choices of the function p(·) such algorithms are guaranteed to provide maximum stability in arbitrary topologies, without any explicit knowledge of the arrival rates. However, lower bounds in [23] demonstrate that for such choices of p(·) the delays are of the order exp 1 2(1−ρ) , growing even faster with the load than the (1 − ρ) −L scaling we obtained for the L × L toric grid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The definition (6) of κ(x)/τ (x) consists of the first positive and second negative terms. If the weights of schedules are close to the maximum weight, the negative draft of L occurs, which contributes the first positive term of (6). The second negative term of (6) bounds the possible positive draft of L for other cases.…”
Section: Proof Outline Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%