Delegitimizing Women Management Scholars’ Underrepresentation in the Research Impact Agenda

Yarrow, Emily; Davies, Julie

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12725-0_7

Palgrave Debates in Business and Management

2022

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12725-0_7

|View full text |Cite

Delegitimizing Women Management Scholars’ Underrepresentation in the Research Impact Agenda

Emily Yarrow¹,

Julie Davies²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

A typology of sexism in contemporary business schools: Belligerent, benevolent, ambivalent, and oblivious sexism

Yarrow

Davies

2022

Gender Work & Organization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The legitimacy of business schools is based on rankings, revenues, branding, and opportunities to support staff and students "to make a difference in the world". Yet sexism in business schools is endemic. Drawing on Acker's inequality regimes framework and a thematic analysis of reports in Poets&Quants, EFMD's Global Focus and AACSB International's BizEd/AACSB Insights over a decade, this study explores how business schools are dealing (or not) with sexism. We propose a typology of four categories of sexism in business schools: belligerent, benevolent, ambivalent, and oblivious sexism. Our findings contribute to understandings of institutional theory and the institutional development of business schools as important sites of (sexist and gendered) knowledge production and dissemination and entrenched inequalities. We posit that media constructions of sexism may better inform individual decisions, organizational development, and governance about the imperative to eliminate sexist behaviors and discrimination. We argue that business schools need to gain substantive legitimacy as effective role models by reforming themselves. They must actively tackle

show abstract

A typology of sexism in contemporary business schools: Belligerent, benevolent, ambivalent, and oblivious sexism

Yarrow

Davies

2022

Gender Work & Organization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Delegitimizing Women Management Scholars’ Underrepresentation in the Research Impact Agenda

Cited by 1 publication

References 29 publications

A typology of sexism in contemporary business schools: Belligerent, benevolent, ambivalent, and oblivious sexism

A typology of sexism in contemporary business schools: Belligerent, benevolent, ambivalent, and oblivious sexism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About