2016
DOI: 10.5351/csam.2016.23.3.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deletion diagnostics in fitting a given regression model to a new observation

Abstract: A graphical diagnostic method based on multiple case deletions in a regression context is introduced by using the sampling distribution of the difference between two least squares estimators with and without multiple cases. Principal components analysis plays a key role in deriving this diagnostic method. Multiple case deletions of test statistic are also considered when a new observation is fitted to a given regression model. The result is useful for detecting influential observations in econometric data anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the probabilistic behavior ofβ−β (r) through the spectral decomposition of its covariance matrix cov(β −β (r) ), Kim (2015) introduced an influence measure M r = x T r (X T X) −2 x r /(1 − h rr ) to investigate the influence of deleting an observation on the least squares estimateβ, and the problem of deleting multiple cases was considered by Kim (2016). For these three data sets, the result based on the D r values will be compared with that based on the M r values.…”
Section: Three Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the probabilistic behavior ofβ−β (r) through the spectral decomposition of its covariance matrix cov(β −β (r) ), Kim (2015) introduced an influence measure M r = x T r (X T X) −2 x r /(1 − h rr ) to investigate the influence of deleting an observation on the least squares estimateβ, and the problem of deleting multiple cases was considered by Kim (2016). For these three data sets, the result based on the D r values will be compared with that based on the M r values.…”
Section: Three Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%