1994
DOI: 10.1021/bi00186a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deletion Mutants of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase A Support a Model of Cyclic Association and Dissociation of Enzyme from DNA Ends During DNA Repair

Abstract: With an in vitro DNA repair system, Satoh and Lindah [(1992) Nature 356, 356-358] demonstrated that unmodified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PADPRP) binds to radiation-damaged DNA and inhibits repair in the absence of NAD. However, in the presence of NAD, PADPRP undergoes automodification and the DNA is repaired. It was hypothesized that PADPRP cycles between an unmodified form, which protects DNA breaks, and an automodified form, which is released from DNA, thereby allowing access to repair enzymes. We have no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancies in the possible role of ADPRT in DNA repair may be attributable to the fact that previous studies used either ADPRT inhibitors, which may have additional nonspecific effects, or spontanous ADPRT mutant cell lines, which contain reduced levels of ADPRT. In agreement with our data showing that ADPRT is not a critical regulatory component in the DNA repair process are studies demonstrating that DNA repair was apparently independent of ADPRT (Satoh and Lindahl 1992;Satoh et al 1993;Smulson et al 1994). These results suggest that ADPRT acts as a "nick-protection" molecule to prevent accidental homologous recombination events and is needed for the maintenance of chromatin structure (Althaus et al 1990;Satoh et al 1994).…”
Section: Dna Repair Processes Are Not Affected By the Lack Of Poly(adsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The discrepancies in the possible role of ADPRT in DNA repair may be attributable to the fact that previous studies used either ADPRT inhibitors, which may have additional nonspecific effects, or spontanous ADPRT mutant cell lines, which contain reduced levels of ADPRT. In agreement with our data showing that ADPRT is not a critical regulatory component in the DNA repair process are studies demonstrating that DNA repair was apparently independent of ADPRT (Satoh and Lindahl 1992;Satoh et al 1993;Smulson et al 1994). These results suggest that ADPRT acts as a "nick-protection" molecule to prevent accidental homologous recombination events and is needed for the maintenance of chromatin structure (Althaus et al 1990;Satoh et al 1994).…”
Section: Dna Repair Processes Are Not Affected By the Lack Of Poly(adsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Cell lines transfected with and overproducing the 'DNA binding domain' (DBD) of PADPRP, thus inhibiting endogenous PADPRP activation, are also hypersensitive to monofunctional alkylating agents, and are unable to carry out unscheduled DNA synthesis (Molinette et al, 1993). Similar results have been obtained by reducing endogenous PADPRP synthesis by the use of antisense olignucleotides to PADPRP (Smulson et al, 1994). Finally, elegant in vitro experiments using crude cell extracts which can carry out DNA repair have established that PADPRP, in the absence of substrate, blocks DNA strand breaks snd prevents subsequent steps leading to religation of the DNA (Satoh and Lindhal, 1992;Satoh et al, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Due to the charge repulsion the protein rapidly dissociates from DNA (4,33,34). Therefore, we next tested the ability of PARP to bind hairpin-containing DNA under conditions conducive to PARP automodification.…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%