IAEG/AEG Annual Meeting Proceedings, San Francisco, California, 2018 - Volume 4 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93133-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delft3D Morphological Modeling Downstream of Sergio Motta Reservoir Dam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At VP6, this increase will be 0.5 m, and at Tui it will be 0.4 m. For the RCP 4.5 and RP 100 years' scenarios, the water level increase will be about 0.4 m at VP1 and VP4, 0.3 m at VP6, and 0.2 m at Tui. Results for scenarios involving RP 50 years do not show differences between the two emissions scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) since, according to [22], the predicted ocean extreme water levels are identical. In this case, the expected water level rises are 0.2 m at VP1, VP4, and VP6, and 0.1 m at Tui.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At VP6, this increase will be 0.5 m, and at Tui it will be 0.4 m. For the RCP 4.5 and RP 100 years' scenarios, the water level increase will be about 0.4 m at VP1 and VP4, 0.3 m at VP6, and 0.2 m at Tui. Results for scenarios involving RP 50 years do not show differences between the two emissions scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) since, according to [22], the predicted ocean extreme water levels are identical. In this case, the expected water level rises are 0.2 m at VP1, VP4, and VP6, and 0.1 m at Tui.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The bias analysis demonstrated that both data sets selected from field campaigns and hydrometric gauges for calibration, resulted in a slight underestimation of the water levels. The various sources of uncertainty associated either to the defined extreme ocean water levels [22] or the implemented model forcing functions and parameters, advised a continuous effort in the calibration of the model. An adequate answer to this inherent uncertainty is to turn the model operational [34] and to use assimilation techniques [35], based on continuous monitoring data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Delft3D software was selected to implement a 2DH model of the Douro estuary. This software solves the Reynolds averaged conservation equations of mass and momentum, being able to simulate hydrodynamics with acceptable accuracy [6,13].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%