2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of reflexive governance has been mainly elaborated in three distinct but related strands of the environmental governance literature: the work on transition management (Grin, Rotmans, & Schot, 2010;Jhagroe & Loorbach, 2015), sustainability governance (Newig, Voß, & Monstadt, 2007;Voß et al, 2006) and deliberative democracy for environmental governance (Dryzek & Pickering, 2017). Applications of the concept can be found across a broad range of environmental and sustainability issue areas, with four areas standing out: First, discussions about knowledge governance (Gerritsen, Stuiver, & Termeer, 2013), e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of reflexive governance has been mainly elaborated in three distinct but related strands of the environmental governance literature: the work on transition management (Grin, Rotmans, & Schot, 2010;Jhagroe & Loorbach, 2015), sustainability governance (Newig, Voß, & Monstadt, 2007;Voß et al, 2006) and deliberative democracy for environmental governance (Dryzek & Pickering, 2017). Applications of the concept can be found across a broad range of environmental and sustainability issue areas, with four areas standing out: First, discussions about knowledge governance (Gerritsen, Stuiver, & Termeer, 2013), e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, the turn towards spoke-and-hub organisational modality evidenced the intrinsic organisational reflexivity [62], though the mid-term consequences of this change upon their reflexivity of governance remained a contested issue amongst participants. Austerity has been found to impact negatively upon discursive governance spaces [6,63,64], though this research discerned a tension where austerity was instead precipitating change towards new organisational modalities that instead favoured commercial reflexivity [51] at the costs of discursive capacities and values [63]. This was a tension between austerity-induced marketisation of collaborative environmental governance structures, and the extant governance and management values of collaborative decision making and discursiveness (see [21]).…”
Section: Collaborative Governancementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Further research could also explore how ongoing support from contributor countries and development institutions for fossil fuel production and consumption affects, or is influenced by, fragmentation in climate finance. In addition, research could assess whether the climate finance system has developed-or could develop in future-a reflexive capacity to deliberate on and respond to the degree of fragmentation and complexity in the system (see Dryzek and Pickering 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%