2018
DOI: 10.16997/jdd.304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deliberation in Democracy’s Dark Times

Abstract: This piece reflects on the on the legacies of democratic deliberation, particularly mini-publics in responding to issues of disinformation, bigotry and nativism that has entered the political mainstream today. It aims to provoke conversations about the limitations of mini-publics in promoting democratic renewal and reconsider the functions of these forums in democracy's 'dark times.'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scholars nevertheless argue that a very wide opening can lead to vague and abstract deliberations (Michels & Binema 2018) or a "wish list" outcome (Oleart 2023). For several authors, the key here is to establish a meaningful connection between the micro-deliberation of these spaces and the macro-deliberation of the public sphere (Beauvis 2018;Curato & Parry 2018). This can include ensuring that deliberations address social conflicts and dilemmas (Oleart 2023), increasing public support for mini-publics through collaboration with activists (Felicetti & della Porta 2019), or subjecting the results of mini-publics to public scrutiny to generalize their bounded validity (Olsen & Trenz 2014).…”
Section: Civil Mass Participation and Impact On Political Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars nevertheless argue that a very wide opening can lead to vague and abstract deliberations (Michels & Binema 2018) or a "wish list" outcome (Oleart 2023). For several authors, the key here is to establish a meaningful connection between the micro-deliberation of these spaces and the macro-deliberation of the public sphere (Beauvis 2018;Curato & Parry 2018). This can include ensuring that deliberations address social conflicts and dilemmas (Oleart 2023), increasing public support for mini-publics through collaboration with activists (Felicetti & della Porta 2019), or subjecting the results of mini-publics to public scrutiny to generalize their bounded validity (Olsen & Trenz 2014).…”
Section: Civil Mass Participation and Impact On Political Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%