1994
DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)90054-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deliberation scheduling for problem solving in time-constrained environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
107
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, in reality, this improvement is not so perfectly predictable, but these functions are often used as a modeling simplification. They are called (deterministic) performance profiles (Horvitz 1987;Boddy and Dean 1994;Zilberstein and Russell 1996).…”
Section: Variants Of the Metareasoning Problem And Their Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, in reality, this improvement is not so perfectly predictable, but these functions are often used as a modeling simplification. They are called (deterministic) performance profiles (Horvitz 1987;Boddy and Dean 1994;Zilberstein and Russell 1996).…”
Section: Variants Of the Metareasoning Problem And Their Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formalisation results in a deliberation schedule procedure DS, that is described below. An important assumption Boddy and Dean make is that at any moment in time the agent knows about Boddy & Dean, 1994). Assume that an agent has two future events, c 1 and c 2 , to respond to, and aims to maximise the value of both responses.…”
Section: Continuous Deliberation Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it generates {␦ i } which maximises ⌺ n i i (␦ i ). For the detailed formulation of DS and the optimality proof, we refer the reader to Boddy & Dean (1994).…”
Section: Continuous Deliberation Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations