2020
DOI: 10.1111/josl.12418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deliberative control in audiovisual sociolinguistic perception*

Abstract: Cognitive models of sociolinguistics must support a wide range of goal‐oriented behavior (e.g. Eckert, 2000a) without suggesting unrealistic levels of deliberative control on the part of speakers. The current study investigates the limits of deliberative control in audiovisual face‐voice perception. Perceivers evaluated co‐present recorded speech and static face pictures, rating the stimuli on the scales ‘accented’ and ‘good‐looking’ in one of three conditions: as a combined voice and face; evaluating the face… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of co‐occurrence in the formation of indexical associations is perhaps worth putting into a broader context within cognitive sociolinguistics. A number of studies have, for instance, investigated the role of co‐occurring nonlinguistic cues—such as conversation topics or even stuffed toys—in influencing sociolinguistic perception (e.g., Love & Walker, 2013; Hurring et al., 2022; see Campbell‐Kibler, 2010 for further discussion of such questions in sociolinguistic cognition), while other work has focused on the role of co‐occurring linguistic cues in motivating expectation‐based conversational convergence on linguistic variants that are not themselves observed (e.g., Wade, 2022; see also Wade and Roberts, 2020, for an artificial‐language approach to this question). This work points to the role of top‐down cues in language processing (and production) given established sociolinguistic categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of co‐occurrence in the formation of indexical associations is perhaps worth putting into a broader context within cognitive sociolinguistics. A number of studies have, for instance, investigated the role of co‐occurring nonlinguistic cues—such as conversation topics or even stuffed toys—in influencing sociolinguistic perception (e.g., Love & Walker, 2013; Hurring et al., 2022; see Campbell‐Kibler, 2010 for further discussion of such questions in sociolinguistic cognition), while other work has focused on the role of co‐occurring linguistic cues in motivating expectation‐based conversational convergence on linguistic variants that are not themselves observed (e.g., Wade, 2022; see also Wade and Roberts, 2020, for an artificial‐language approach to this question). This work points to the role of top‐down cues in language processing (and production) given established sociolinguistic categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interpretation of speech, individuals' explicit ideological beliefs and alignment with linguistic forms may shape their awareness of the form's socially indexed meaning (Sherwood, 2019). The ability of participants to ignore social information in listening tasks also demonstrates that deliberative control also plays a significant role in speech perception (Campbell‐Kibler, 2020).…”
Section: Gender As Evaluative Differencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental representations of probabilistic conditioning information are apparently available to listeners for use in both linguistic and social processing, and the processing system calls on those representations as needed for the task at hand. This suggests that modular, separate constructs like the sociolinguistic monitor, thought to track and store information about sociolinguistic variation for use in social evaluation (Labov et al, 2011), may not be necessary (see also Campbell-Kibler, 2021). Listeners show sensitivity to probabilistic information about what conditions (ING) variation in both social and linguistic tasks, albeit in the manner most appropriate to the task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study examines the social force of a form based on both internal constraints and stylistic congruence. The accent rating task is used as a holistic way to elicit listeners’ impressions, following work by Campbell-Kibler (2007, 2021) for variable (ING) as well as work in second language speech perception (e.g., Munro & Derwing, 1995). The underspecified nature of “accent” affords listeners a general dimension along which to rate speakers.…”
Section: The Present Study: Within- and Across-variable Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%