2019
DOI: 10.1017/s0003055419000182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deliberative Democracy in an Unequal World: AText-As-DataStudy of South India’s Village Assemblies

Abstract: This paper opens the “black box” of real-world deliberation by using text-as-data methods on a corpus of transcripts from the constitutionally mandated gram sabhas, or village assemblies, of rural India. Drawing on normative theories of deliberation, we identify empirical standards for “good” deliberation based on one’s ability both to speak and to be heard, and use natural language processing methods to generate these measures. We first show that, even in the rural Indian context, these assemblies are not mer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After all, what is a democratic process without the voices of those with the decision-making power? To this critique, studies of legislative discourse have provided evidence that more deliberative bodies produce more responsive policy agendas (Parthasarathy, Rao, and Palaniswamy 2019;Steiner et al 2004). Bridging the gap between direct citizen participation and representative democracy, recent research has provided evidence that opportunities for citizens to have deliberative conversations with elected officials carry many of the same benefits as small-group, citizen-only discussions (Neblo, Esterling, and Lazer 2018).…”
Section: Participatory Democracy Deliberation and Public Meeting Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After all, what is a democratic process without the voices of those with the decision-making power? To this critique, studies of legislative discourse have provided evidence that more deliberative bodies produce more responsive policy agendas (Parthasarathy, Rao, and Palaniswamy 2019;Steiner et al 2004). Bridging the gap between direct citizen participation and representative democracy, recent research has provided evidence that opportunities for citizens to have deliberative conversations with elected officials carry many of the same benefits as small-group, citizen-only discussions (Neblo, Esterling, and Lazer 2018).…”
Section: Participatory Democracy Deliberation and Public Meeting Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some analyses incorporate a critical approach (Dryzek and Niemeyer 2008, 481), while others remain closer to thick description (Botting and Houser 2006). Some focus on "text as text" (Hawkesworth 2003) while others treat text as data (Parthasarathy, Rao, and Palaniswamy 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a foundational study, Chattopadhyay & Duflo (2004) find that women's leadership on village councils increases investment in access to potable water, a public good prioritized by women in rural India. Councils reserved for women leaders also appear to increase the likelihood that women citizens will be acknowledged and receive a policy-relevant response from council leaders during village meetings (Parthasarathy et al 2019). Quotas also appear to strengthen policy enforcement.…”
Section: Quotas Increase Women's Presence In Political Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%