Deliberative participatory budgeting: A case study of Zeguo Town in China

Abstract

The search for a better practice instrument of civic engagement has led to participatory budgeting and deliberative polling in recent years. Participatory budgeting stresses empowerment and citizens' struggle against the establishment and unequal social structures, whereas deliberative polling works within the system and focuses on improving democratic decision-making processes by applying credible social science methods. Often, these two processes are presented as being in conflict with each other, which is to the detriment of the search for best practice in deliberative governance. This paper develops a theoretical analysis of deliberative participatory budgeting which is distinguished from unrepresentative and non-deliberative but self-selected participatory budgeting; that is, it considers how the quality of participatory budgeting can be improved through deliberative polling. This theoretical analysis is backed by an empirical study of deliberative participatory budgeting in ZeguoTownship, Zhejiang Province, China. It explores whether, how, and under what conditions it is possible to combine deliberative polling and participatory budgeting. It details four experiments and assesses the successes, failures, limitations, and problems of the experiments. The case of Zeguo offers scholars, activists, and officials lessons about how to pursue best deliberative practice in both authoritarian states and democratic societies.

The politics of authoritarian empowerment: Participatory pricing in China

“…Most of the researches about deliberations focus on those at local levels, such as deliberative polling (Fishkin et al, 2010), participatory budgeting (He, 2011; Wu and Wang, 2011), and rural and urban community deliberations (He, 2014; Tang, 2015). These deliberations achieve considerable success in democratic empowerment a high level of deliberation (He 2019), partially because their scale and influence pose a relatively weak threat to the government. In contrast, PP is a nationwide deliberative practice that is legally required to take place in every province in China, providing it with unparalleled coverage.…”

Is Deliberation an Antidote to Extreme Partisan Polarization? Reflections on America in One Room

“…While most of the applications were initially in the US and other western democracies, the dialogue and debate has engaged many countries, including developing countries (Chirawurah et al 2019 and some authoritarian ones. (He and Warren 2011;He 2019) According to some theories of democracy, elected representatives are supposed to deliberate on the merits, regardless of party. (Burke 1774;Bessette 1994).…”

Public Policy in Hybrid Regimes: A Review

“…Несмотря на это, репертуар участия постоянно пополняется все более «демократическими» инновациями, вроде делиберативных площадок и инициативного бюджетирования (He, 2019). Причем это расширение происходит не только за счет индивидуализированных форм участия, но и через подключение к выработке политических курсов негосударственных акторов, вроде НКО (Teets, 2013).…”