2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineating biological and technical variance in single cell expression data

Abstract: Single cell transcriptomics is becoming a common technique to unravel new biological phenomena whose functional significance can only be understood in the light of differences in gene expression between single cells. The technology is still in its early days and therefore suffers from many technical challenges. This review discusses the continuous effort to identify and systematically characterise various sources of technical variability in single cell expression data and the need to further develop experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a plethora of data normalization methods that have been, and continue to be, designed to decrease technical noise within and across cells, in order to better perform both gene detection and quantification, and to make these quantities comparable across cells (see [5, 39, 40] for an overview). The challenge we address here is not mitigated by data normalization methods; however, as we argue that when the number of UMIs sequenced per cell decreases drastically, gene quantification information specifically is not present (or useable) in the data, which is a problem that data normalization cannot mitigate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a plethora of data normalization methods that have been, and continue to be, designed to decrease technical noise within and across cells, in order to better perform both gene detection and quantification, and to make these quantities comparable across cells (see [5, 39, 40] for an overview). The challenge we address here is not mitigated by data normalization methods; however, as we argue that when the number of UMIs sequenced per cell decreases drastically, gene quantification information specifically is not present (or useable) in the data, which is a problem that data normalization cannot mitigate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular standards play an important role in deconvolving biological variation from technical variation arising from a measurement tool . In single‐cell sequencing, synthetic spike‐ins and unique molecular identifiers (e.g., short‐random DNA sequences) directly measure error rates, analytical sensitivity, and biases stemming from sample preparation . In flow cytometry, lasers are calibrated before cell sorting using fluorescent microparticles .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our relative importance analysis indicates that high BTM scores relative to reference datasets is associated with certain datasets, suggesting either technical issues or cell misclassifications. Previous studies support the existence of technical variation in different forms [ 8 , 41 ], which can be quantified using synthetic spike-in genes [ 18 ]. Such approaches have estimated that technical factors can explain more of the variation than their biological counterparts [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%