2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineating the cortico-striatal-cerebellar network in implicit motor sequence learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
60
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
8
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with numerous neuroimaging studies showing that the motor component of learning recruits motorrelated structures with associated striatal and cerebellar regions (Bischoff-Grethe et al, 2004;Grafton et al, 1998Grafton et al, , 2002Hikosaka et al, 2002;Hikosaka et al, 1999;Romei et al, 2009). In the same vein, a recent study showed that a specific pattern of effective connectivity between the motor cortex and the cerebellum support the development of the motor component during initial motor sequence learning (Tzvi et al, 2014). Finally, our findings concord with the evidence that the motor cortex is one of the potential sites involved in the development of the motor representation (Grafton et al, 1998;Karni et al, 1995), which codes for an effector-dependent and movement-based skill realized under egocentric coordinates (Bapi et al, 2000(Bapi et al, , 2006Grafton et al, 1998Grafton et al, , 2002Verwey and Clegg, 2005).…”
Section: Cerebral Correlates Of Allocentric and Egocentric Representasupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in line with numerous neuroimaging studies showing that the motor component of learning recruits motorrelated structures with associated striatal and cerebellar regions (Bischoff-Grethe et al, 2004;Grafton et al, 1998Grafton et al, , 2002Hikosaka et al, 2002;Hikosaka et al, 1999;Romei et al, 2009). In the same vein, a recent study showed that a specific pattern of effective connectivity between the motor cortex and the cerebellum support the development of the motor component during initial motor sequence learning (Tzvi et al, 2014). Finally, our findings concord with the evidence that the motor cortex is one of the potential sites involved in the development of the motor representation (Grafton et al, 1998;Karni et al, 1995), which codes for an effector-dependent and movement-based skill realized under egocentric coordinates (Bapi et al, 2000(Bapi et al, , 2006Grafton et al, 1998Grafton et al, , 2002Verwey and Clegg, 2005).…”
Section: Cerebral Correlates Of Allocentric and Egocentric Representasupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The concept of reciprocal interactions between memory systems has been supported by a series of recent behavioral studies showing interference between declarative and procedural learning, suggesting that these memory systems share common neural networks (Brown and Robertson, 2007a,b;Cohen and Robertson, 2011;Keisler and Shadmehr, 2010; see Robertson, 2012 for a review). Furthermore, in the framework of procedural memory, neuroimaging investigations of functional activation and connectivity associated to motor sequence learning have revealed that both the corticostriato-cerebellar (e.g., Coynel et al, 2010;Debas et al, 2010Debas et al, , 2014Tzvi et al, 2014;see Doyon et al, 2009;Doyon and Benali, 2005;Doyon et al, 2003; for reviews) and hippocampo-cortical networks (Albouy et al, 2008(Albouy et al, , 2012(Albouy et al, , 2013c; see Albouy et al, 2013b for a review) are not only involved in the acquisition, but also in the consolidation of motor sequence memories. However, the respective roles of the striatum and the hippocampus in motor sequence learning and their respective link with subsequent sleep-related changes in performance, an indicator of memory consolidation, remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our results are consistent with recent work implicating cerebellum in sequence learning (e.g. serial reaction task) (Dirnberger et al, 2013;Tzvi et al, 2014) and predictive processing (Kotz et al, 2014;Leggio and Molinari, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, understanding the functional role of multiple brain regions in motor learning requires investigation of distributed brain networks and connectivity patterns. Task-driven functional connectivity (Coynel et al, 2010) and effective connectivity (Ma et al, 2011;Tzvi et al, 2014) have indicated changes in the connections between M1 and the cerebellum during motor learning (Raymond et al, 1996;Inoue et al, 2000;Della-Maggiore et al, 2009). Alternatively, cortico-cerebellar connectivity has been indirectly assessed by evaluating changes in somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) or motor evoked potentials (MEP) (Haavik and Murphy, 2013;Andrew et al, 2015;Baarbé et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%