2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineating the Durability Outcome Differences After Saphenous Ablation with Laser Versus Radiofrequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation (LARA) study conducted by Goode et al 17 in 2009 demonstrated that RFA and EVLA have equal 95% efficacy, with RFA causing less pain and bruising postoperatively. In 2019, Yoon et al 18 reported 343 limbs treated with EVLA or RFA and also found no statistically significant difference in clinical recurrence of reflux between the two groups. Although both of these studies focused on treatment of the GSV, other studies have demonstrated technical success with EVLA and RFA for the treatment of the AASV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation (LARA) study conducted by Goode et al 17 in 2009 demonstrated that RFA and EVLA have equal 95% efficacy, with RFA causing less pain and bruising postoperatively. In 2019, Yoon et al 18 reported 343 limbs treated with EVLA or RFA and also found no statistically significant difference in clinical recurrence of reflux between the two groups. Although both of these studies focused on treatment of the GSV, other studies have demonstrated technical success with EVLA and RFA for the treatment of the AASV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the development of endovenous interventions, the treatment strategy for varicose veins has changed in recent years. Surgical indications for treatment include symptomatic superficial venous insufficiency, CEAP clinical class ⩾ 2, and duration of reversed venous flow exceeding 0.5 s. 14 From January 2017 to December 2020, 1204 patients hospitalized at the Division of Vascular Surgery, Qingpu Branch of Zhongshan Hospital with signs and symptoms of varicose veins (CEAP clinical class ⩾ 2) were enrolled. Patients with previous surgical intervention were not included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients received preoperative duplex ultrasonography to check the presence of reflux in deep and superficial veins and to exclude potential thrombosis. 15 The cut-off value of reflux in the superficial veins was defined as 500 ms. 14 The more severely affected limb was taken into consideration if patients had bilateral lesions. Patients meeting the following criteria were excluded: missing data, < 18 years of age, Klippel–Trenaunay syndrome, history of immune diseases, deep venous thrombosis, peripheral artery diseases (ankle–brachial index < 0.9), or iliac vein compression syndrome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No difference was noted in QoL scores between the two groups at 6 months follow‐up 112 . Overall, several randomized trials have compared RFA with EVLA in terms of safety and efficacy 113–117 . RFA seemed to be at least as efficacious as EVLA in terms of clinical improvement and QoL scores; RFA was associated with less post‐procedural pain and bruising compared with EVLA 69,113,114,116,117 …”
Section: Interventional Treatment Of Superficial Venous Insufficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%