1999
DOI: 10.3133/ofr99335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineation of background laboratory contamination in the analysis of trace concentrations of extractable organic materials in crystalline rocks by Soxhlet extraction, column chromotography, and gas chromatography

Abstract: Contamination checks were carried out for sample preparation, Soxhlet extraction and the subsequent analyses of extracted bitumen, from high-grade metamorphic and igneous rocks, carbonaceous rocks from ore deposits, and other crystalline rocks. We examined possible contamination from solvents, laboratory apparatus, and from most of the analytical steps of the total procedure. The results of our examination were as follows: Once-distilled dichloromethane, twice distilled hexane, twice distilled benzene, and HPL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon passing the leak check, helium pressure was reduced to approximately 25 psia and the reactors were weighed and placed in an electric heater. The loaded reactors were heated from room temperature (∼20 °C) to 360 °C within 1 h (heating rate of ∼6 °C/min) and held at that temperature for 72 h. This treatment typically results in thermal maturities consistent with maximum oil generation . Afterward, the reactors were removed from their heaters and allowed to cool to room temperature overnight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon passing the leak check, helium pressure was reduced to approximately 25 psia and the reactors were weighed and placed in an electric heater. The loaded reactors were heated from room temperature (∼20 °C) to 360 °C within 1 h (heating rate of ∼6 °C/min) and held at that temperature for 72 h. This treatment typically results in thermal maturities consistent with maximum oil generation . Afterward, the reactors were removed from their heaters and allowed to cool to room temperature overnight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loaded reactors were heated from room temperature (∼20 °C) to 360 °C within 1 h (heating rate of ∼6 °C/min) and held at that temperature for 72 h. This treatment typically results in thermal maturities consistent with maximum oil generation. 24 Afterward, the reactors were removed from their heaters and allowed to cool to room temperature overnight. Once cooled, the reactors were weighed to determine mass loss (a small decrease in mass of approximately 0.3 g is expected as a result of burn off of an anti-seize compound used on the compression bolts), reactor temperature and pressure were measured, and gas samples were collected using Swagelok stainless-steel cylinders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%