2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques in Kanakanala Reservoir Subwatershed, Karnataka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential groundwater zone image for the research region was created by combining the scores of seven parameters and associated subdivision score using the weighted overlay approach. (Table 1) [28,29,30].…”
Section: Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential groundwater zone image for the research region was created by combining the scores of seven parameters and associated subdivision score using the weighted overlay approach. (Table 1) [28,29,30].…”
Section: Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the relative importance and influence of these factors mayvary depending on the specific context and location under consideration. In the field of spatial science, data are collected from different sources which are often in varying formats and resolutions, necessitating the harmonization of data into a uniform format and resolution (Savita et al 2018). Consequently, the data processing task involves in pre-processing and post-processing activities.…”
Section: Data Preparation and Identification Of Factors Influencing G...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different values of N, Saaty's ratio index(Abdalla et al 2020;Allafta and Opp, 2021;Jabbar et al 2019;Savita et al 2018;Teja and Singh, 2019) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…very good, good, moderate, poor, and very poor. Prasad et al, (2020) (Srivastava and Bhattacharya, 2006;Suja Rose and Krishnan, 2009;Nagarajan and Singh, 2009;Muthukrishnan et al, 2013;Nag and Ghosh, 2013;Al-Abadi and Al-Shammaá, 2014;Fashae et al, 2014;Dey, 2014;Fenta et al, 2015;Husein et al, 2017;Das et al, 2018;Savita et al, 2018;Shah and Lone, 2019).…”
Section: Introduction Introduction Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%