2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineation uncertainties of tumour volumes on MRI of head and neck cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the points discussed above, it is important to emphasize the potential clinical implications of improved cochlea delineation in radiotherapy contouring. Accurate delineation of organs at risk (OARs) is a crucial step in radiation therapy planning, as it directly impacts the dose distribution and, consequently, the potential side effects and treatment outcomes [ 18 ]. In the case of the cochlea, precise contouring is particularly important, as the organ is responsible for hearing and is sensitive to radiation-induced damage [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the points discussed above, it is important to emphasize the potential clinical implications of improved cochlea delineation in radiotherapy contouring. Accurate delineation of organs at risk (OARs) is a crucial step in radiation therapy planning, as it directly impacts the dose distribution and, consequently, the potential side effects and treatment outcomes [ 18 ]. In the case of the cochlea, precise contouring is particularly important, as the organ is responsible for hearing and is sensitive to radiation-induced damage [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of poorer quality MRIs in radiation oncology contouring has been reported, particularly in the context of specified radiation oncology set-ups including immobilisation, which can create a challenge for optimal coil placement and is an area for further exploration in the MRL setting. 5,14 Inter-observer variability in radiation oncology contouring is well documented, with training/education initiatives aimed at reducing this. Khoo et al 15 reported on the reduction of both inter-and intra-observer contour variation in prostate contouring following an education program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the same datasets were being scored, we suggest that the increase in both the VGA scores and confidence were due to the training increasing the participant's knowledge of the MR‐specifics and, therefore, scored more positively. The impact of poorer quality MRIs in radiation oncology contouring has been reported, particularly in the context of specified radiation oncology set‐ups including immobilisation, which can create a challenge for optimal coil placement and is an area for further exploration in the MRL setting 5,14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, radiologists manually delineate the tumor boundaries on CT and MR images in HNC; however, this is a time-consuming process and prone to high inter-reader variability due to the morphological complexity of HNC and potential artifacts. 12 , 13 Accurate delineation of OARs and tumor volumes is critical for minimizing radiation toxicities and maximizing tumor control in HNC’s concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) planning. 14 Atlas-based segmentation has proven to be a promising time-saving method for contouring HNC patients undergoing RT or CCRT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%