2014
DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delirium diagnosis, screening and management

Abstract: Purpose of reviewOur review focuses on recent developments across many settings regarding the diagnosis, screening and management of delirium, so as to inform these aspects in the context of palliative and supportive care.Recent findingsDelirium diagnostic criteria have been updated in the long-awaited Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition. Studies suggest that poor recognition of delirium relates to its clinical characteristics, inadequate interprofessional communication and lack of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the terminal phase of illness, it can be challenging to use the currently available validated delirium screening and diagnostic tools, especially for hypoactive delirium and for patients with a reduced level of consciousness and communication because of natural disease progression (30)(31)(32)(33). The final item on the observational Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) (34) on psychomotor retardation was designed to detect hypoactive delirium, but may be rated by nurses observing increasing fatigue and patients spending more time in bed as part of the terminal phase.…”
Section: Exploring the "Terminal Delirium" Paradigm: Recognition Issumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the terminal phase of illness, it can be challenging to use the currently available validated delirium screening and diagnostic tools, especially for hypoactive delirium and for patients with a reduced level of consciousness and communication because of natural disease progression (30)(31)(32)(33). The final item on the observational Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) (34) on psychomotor retardation was designed to detect hypoactive delirium, but may be rated by nurses observing increasing fatigue and patients spending more time in bed as part of the terminal phase.…”
Section: Exploring the "Terminal Delirium" Paradigm: Recognition Issumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 Delirium or cognitive failure is particularly prevalent in the terminal stages of palliative care patient's illness trajectory and should be screened for at the time of admission in order to be able to detect changes in patient status. 47 Evidence suggests that standardised systematic assessment is a critical component of a comprehensive admission assessment and can increase accuracy and efficiency of the assessment process. 16,48 Increasing the comprehensiveness of assessments has increased the accuracy of assessments.…”
Section: 38mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common finding was that the knowledge level of nurses was determined to be average when examined for delirium and risk factors and complications from delirium (Baker, et Establishing accuracy of the delirium recognition screenings was not specifically addressed in this project, however is essential to further implement interventions to mitigate short and longterm consequences from delirium (Lawlor & Bush, 2014) and could be a natural evolution for this project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Delirium prevalence rates vary from 20-27% in acute care and up to 87% in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. 2 Adverse outcomes for the critically ill patient experiencing delirium are widely published and include prolonged mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay, persistent cognitive impairment, and increased mortality. [3][4][5][6] Statistically significant increases in ventilator days, re-intubation rates, and accidental removal of tubes are also described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation