Delivering Clinical Practice Guideline–Concordant Care for PTSD and Major Depression in Military Treatment Facilities

Abstract

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1692Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication.ISBN: 978-0-8330-9749-1 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND CorporationR® is a registered trademark. Cover: photo by Sgt. Jason Kemp, 1st Infantry Division Headquarters.iii PrefaceThe U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) strives to maintain a physically and psychologically healthy, mission-ready force, and the care provided by the Military Health System (MHS) is critical to meeting this goal. Given the rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) among U.S. service members, attention has been directed to ensuring the quality and availability of programs and services targeting these and other psychological health conditions. Understanding the capacity of the MHS and its providers to deliver high-quality care for PTSD and MDD is an important step in support of future efforts to improve care across the MHS.DoD's Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury (DCoE) asked the RAND Corporation to conduct an assessment of the capacity of the MHS to deliver evidence-based care for PTSD and MDD and to recommend areas in which the MHS could focus its efforts to continuously improve the quality of care provided to all service members. This document is the final report on the results of that study. Specifically, this report (1) provides an overview of the psychological health (PH) workforce at military treatment facilities (MTFs), (2) describes the extent to which PH providers within MTFs report delivering guideline-concordant care for PTSD and MDD, (3) identifies facilitators and barriers to providing this care, and (4) provides recommendations to increase the use and monitoring of guideline-concordant care for PTSD and MDD. It complements other RAND studies that have examined administrative data and medical records of service members diagnosed with PTSD o...

2018 Department of Defense Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS): Results for the Active Component

“…On the other hand, the finding that receipt of medications-which can be prescribed by nonspecialty medical practitioners-increased more than receipt of specialty mental health care may indicate greater demand for mental health care that is not being met by specialty providers. A recent report that analyzed survey data from mental health providers in military treatment facilities found that limited provider availability and service members' competing work duties were commonly endorsed barriers to providing specialty mental health care for service members (Hepner et al, 2017). Service members seeking mental health care might benefit from increased access to specialty care if those barriers are reduced.…”

Improving Behavioral Health Care for U.S. Army Personnel: Identifying Predictors of Treatment Outcomes

“…Our sample was limited by our selection criteria, making it difficult to assess the extent of measurement-based care. However, a 2016 survey of BH providers suggested that 76 percent of Army BH providers screened soldiers for PTSD or depression using a validated measure, but only 59 percent reported using symptom data to inform treatment (Hepner, Farris, et al, 2017). Measurement-based care involves the repeated collection of outcome data and the use of those data to inform decisions throughout the course of treatment (Fortney et al, 2016).…”

A Framework for Inferring and Analyzing Pharmacotherapy Treatment Patterns

“…Veterans from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), and Operation New Dawn (OND) have higher percentages of major depressive episodes than nonveterans of the same age 5 . In response, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has decreased suicides, improved drug monitoring programs, and increased population coverage by expanding mental health resources and by focusing existing resources on clinical practices that make the most difference [6][7][8][9][10] . Existing reports and dashboards at VA cannot support policymakers with enough detailed insight into the full array of patient-level clinical treatment pathways to guide corrective action and resource provisioning efforts [11][12][13][14][15] .…”