2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delivery of nicotine aerosol to mice via a modified electronic cigarette device

Abstract: Background Although both men and women use e-cigarettes, most preclinical nicotine research has focused on its effects in male rodents following injection. The goals of the present study were to develop an effective e-cigarette nicotine delivery system, to compare results to those obtained after subcutaneous (s.c.) injection, and to examine sex differences in the model. Methods Hypothermia and locomotor suppression were assessed following aerosol exposure or s.c. injection with nicotine in female and male mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
33
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is difficult to compare CPP results between studies because of methodological differences, the change in preference of our highest dose duration (8-min puff exposure) appears to be roughly equivalent with those found with subcutaneous injections of 0.6 mg/kg ( Torres et al, 2008 ). This is consistent with the plasma nicotine levels observed at the longest exposure duration, with levels roughly equivalent to the peak concentrations seen with subcutaneous injections of 0.5 mg/kg ( Lefever et al, 2017 ). These levels are also akin to those seen in adult cigarette smokers ( Matta et al, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although it is difficult to compare CPP results between studies because of methodological differences, the change in preference of our highest dose duration (8-min puff exposure) appears to be roughly equivalent with those found with subcutaneous injections of 0.6 mg/kg ( Torres et al, 2008 ). This is consistent with the plasma nicotine levels observed at the longest exposure duration, with levels roughly equivalent to the peak concentrations seen with subcutaneous injections of 0.5 mg/kg ( Lefever et al, 2017 ). These levels are also akin to those seen in adult cigarette smokers ( Matta et al, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Simpler designs have also been implemented. An e-cigarette exposure apparatus by Lefever et al (2017) is most similar to OV in its low-cost and simple construction; however, similar to the previously described device, it makes use of an atomizer for vapor generation, therefore limiting its use to e-liquids. OV can be used with any vaporizer and has been used with both pod devices and cannabis flower vaporizers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, a 0.8 mg/kg dose of nicotine injected, s.c., reduced activity rates. Hypothermia is produced by parenteral injection of nicotine in rats (Levin et al 2003) as is hyperlocomotion (Bryson et al 1981;Clemens et al 2009;Green et al 2003) and decreased body temperature was observed after vapor inhalation of nicotine in mice (Lefever et al 2017). Furthermore, the effects of inhaled nicotine in this study were shown to be mediated by the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) since they were attenuated (temperature) or blocked entirely (locomotion) by pre-treatment with mecamylamine ( Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are as yet relatively few studies of the effects of ENDS in rodent models, however, recent studies showed e-cigarette based vapor inhalation of nicotine in mice reduced body temperature and locomotor activity (Lefever et al, 2017) and increased platelet activity (Qasim et al, 2018), which together demonstrate the feasibility of the approach. The paucity of models is underlined by the fact that several recent studies have resorted to parenteral injection of e-cigarette refill liquids to determine effects in rats (Bunney et al, 2018;El Golli et al, 2016;Golli et al, 2016;Harris et al, 2015;LeSage et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%