2020
DOI: 10.1142/s0129167x20500779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delta-invariants for Fano varieties with large automorphism groups

Abstract: For a variety [Formula: see text], a big [Formula: see text]-divisor [Formula: see text] and a closed connected subgroup [Formula: see text] we define a [Formula: see text]-invariant version of the [Formula: see text]-threshold. We prove that for a Fano variety [Formula: see text] and a connected subgroup [Formula: see text] this invariant characterizes [Formula: see text]-equivariant uniform [Formula: see text]-stability. We also use this invariant to investigate [Formula: see text]-equivariant [Formula: see … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This follows directly from its construction. Indeed, taking a G-equivariant resolution of indeterminacy Y X × P 1 X , one realises the proper transform X0 ⊂ Y 0 as a G-invariant divisor of Y, implying that v X 0 is a G-invariant divisorial valuation on X , exactly as in Golota's proof in the Fano case [34,Proposition 3.13]. The second is that the integral test configuration associated with a G-invariant dreamy prime divisor is a G-equivariant test configuration, which, as noted by Zhu in the Fano setting [55, Theorem 3.5], follows immediately from its definition as…”
Section: Theorem 320 a Polarised Variety (X L) Is G-equivariantly Integrally K-polystable If And Only If β(F) ≥ 0 For All G-invariant Drmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This follows directly from its construction. Indeed, taking a G-equivariant resolution of indeterminacy Y X × P 1 X , one realises the proper transform X0 ⊂ Y 0 as a G-invariant divisor of Y, implying that v X 0 is a G-invariant divisorial valuation on X , exactly as in Golota's proof in the Fano case [34,Proposition 3.13]. The second is that the integral test configuration associated with a G-invariant dreamy prime divisor is a G-equivariant test configuration, which, as noted by Zhu in the Fano setting [55, Theorem 3.5], follows immediately from its definition as…”
Section: Theorem 320 a Polarised Variety (X L) Is G-equivariantly Integrally K-polystable If And Only If β(F) ≥ 0 For All G-invariant Drmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We say that a dreamy prime divisor F ⊂ Y is G-invariant if there is a G action on Y , making the map Y → X a G-invariant map, such that F is itself a G-invariant divisor on Y (by which we mean G sends F to itself rather than F being contained in the fixed point locus of G). The following is a variant of work of Golota and Zhu [34,55].…”
Section: Equivariant K-polystabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows directly from its construction. Indeed, taking a G-equivariant resolution of indeterminacy Y X × P 1 X , one realises the proper transform X0 ⊂ Y 0 as a G-invariant divisor of Y, implying that v X0 is a G-invariant divisorial valuation on X, exactly as in Golota's proof in the Fano case [31,Proposition 3.13]. The second is that the integral test configuration associated with a G-invariant dreamy prime divisor is a G-equivariant test configuration, which, as noted by Zhu in the Fano setting [50,Theorem 3.5], follows immediately from its definition as…”
Section: Proof Integrating By Parts Givesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…divisor on Y (by which we mean G sends F to itself rather than F being contained in the fixed point locus of G). The following is a variant of work of Golota and Zhu [31,50]. Theorem 3.20.…”
Section: Proof Integrating By Parts Givesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But we will take a purely algebraic approach, again making use of the C * -action. Indeed, by [BJ17,Gol19], to compute δ, it is enough to consider C * -invariant divisorial valuations, which can greatly simplify the computation. 1.2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%