Academic discourse should equip and empower educators with language that strengthens their communication and safeguards their understanding, usefulness, and uplift all people, places, and purposes. However, when they rely primarily on their own thoughts, actions, and beliefs, i.e., their epistemic justification, reinforced by their generational perpetuation of practice, educators may or may not express themselves with language that respects, values, and honors diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. Delving into critical consciousness, the T.A.B.L.E.T.S. model, and the AIR strategy, this chapter provides foundations, frames, and filters for educators to acknowledge their own epistemic justification and epistemic injustice. This chapter offers ways for educators to acknowledge their pretenses, adjust their perspectives, and adopt their practices to advance academic discourse that realistically and responsibly authenticates “liberty and justice for all” (Bellamy, 1952), words frequently and fervently declared with distinction when reciting the United States Pledge of Allegiance.