2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demagnetization factors for cylindrical shells and related shapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also physically satisfying that the result for the ring torus appears similar to the axial demagnetization factor for the ring of square cross section (see Beleggia et al 2009), the latter being the only other non-simply connected body characterized by a single aspect ratio. Note that the relationship for establishing the correspondence between the two bodies is given by a simple formula between their unique aspect ratios, α for the torus and σ for the square ring, with σ being the ratio of the inner and outer radii of the square ring: α = (1 − σ )/(1 + σ ), or conversely, σ = (1 − α)/(1 + α).…”
Section: (D) the Demagnetization Tensor Of A Torussupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It is also physically satisfying that the result for the ring torus appears similar to the axial demagnetization factor for the ring of square cross section (see Beleggia et al 2009), the latter being the only other non-simply connected body characterized by a single aspect ratio. Note that the relationship for establishing the correspondence between the two bodies is given by a simple formula between their unique aspect ratios, α for the torus and σ for the square ring, with σ being the ratio of the inner and outer radii of the square ring: α = (1 − σ )/(1 + σ ), or conversely, σ = (1 − α)/(1 + α).…”
Section: (D) the Demagnetization Tensor Of A Torussupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Although the depolarization factors of some sample geometries has been theoretically calculated in free space by a number of researchers (see, for instance, [20], [22], and [23]), they are usually not applicable with reasonable accuracy in the CPM and they need to be determined by calibration procedures; typically, by measuring materials with known permittivity [24]- [27]. The term in (7) intends to remove wall losses in the perturbed cavity by assuming that the -factor of the walls remains the same when the specimen is introduced into the cavity.…”
Section: A Cpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (7) is then rewritten as (10) The QS perturbation analysis of samples contained in holders (such as the case of the cavity shown in Fig. 1) implies the analysis of three-phase media [23] and the precise knowledge of the permittivity and dimensions of the containers. However, the influence of sample holders in measurements is minimized by considering the cavity with the empty sample holder as the unperturbed situation [29].…”
Section: A Cpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the material and geometry parameters, we choose parameters representative of current CoCrPt based magnetic recording media: a hard cylinder radius of 1 R =3 nm and a height of 1 t =3,6,9,12,15 nm; the saturation magnetization of the soft material is twice that of hard material; and the coercivity of the hard cylinder is twice its saturation magnetization ( [ ] N represent the axial demagnetization factors for the cylinder and the shell, respectively [11]. Equations (6)(7)(8) were derived based on the integral form of the dipolar coupling factor, as discussed in [11] and [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (6)(7)(8) were derived based on the integral form of the dipolar coupling factor, as discussed in [11] and [12]. The demagnetization factors of cylinders and shells can be expressed as combinations of elliptic integrals [11,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%