2023
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2022.3221699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demagnetization Monitoring and Identification in PM Generators With Concentrated Windings During Transient Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods have been reported for diagnosing short-circuit faults, with machine current signature analysis being the most popular method [3][4][5]. In addition, the winding function approach [6][7][8], finite element approach [9,10], frequency signature analysis [11,12], frequency response analysis [13,14], and sound analysis [15] have been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been reported for diagnosing short-circuit faults, with machine current signature analysis being the most popular method [3][4][5]. In addition, the winding function approach [6][7][8], finite element approach [9,10], frequency signature analysis [11,12], frequency response analysis [13,14], and sound analysis [15] have been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, demagnetization, together with angular, axial, static, and dynamic eccentricity. Gyftakis et al [33] proposed a method based on higher harmonics of the stator current spectrum. The proposed method can separate demagnetization from eccentricity and short-circuit faults while taking into account transient machine conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%