1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.367113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferromagnetic prisms

Abstract: An analytic expression is given for the magnetometric demagnetizing factors of the general rectangular prism, with special emphasis on the particular case of a square cross section. It is argued that this demagnetizing factor should be used in numerical computations that assume such prisms, when comparing the results with the theoretical study of ellipsoids.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
682
1
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,122 publications
(718 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
27
682
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat capacity and magnetic torque were measured using a Quantum Design PPMS, while the dc magnetization was acquired using a MPMS XL SQUID magnetometer from the same manufacturer. Geometric demagnetization corrections 17 have been applied to all our data, except the specific heat and torque. Given the large magnetic moment in EuTiO 3 , it is essential to include the demagnetization factor in order to perform any meaningful quantitative comparison between experiment and theory.…”
Section: Methods and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat capacity and magnetic torque were measured using a Quantum Design PPMS, while the dc magnetization was acquired using a MPMS XL SQUID magnetometer from the same manufacturer. Geometric demagnetization corrections 17 have been applied to all our data, except the specific heat and torque. Given the large magnetic moment in EuTiO 3 , it is essential to include the demagnetization factor in order to perform any meaningful quantitative comparison between experiment and theory.…”
Section: Methods and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inset: The lower solid curves show the susceptibility measured for spherical (green) and cubic samples (blue), from which N cube was derived in this work. The upper curves correspond to data transformed with N = 1/3 [7], which is incorrect for the cube (upper blue line), but yields the correct intrinsic susceptibility for the sphere (upper green line). The dashed lines show the predicted theoretical continuation of the experimental data.…”
Section: Experimental Determination Of Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Newton and Euler, the analysis of general systems has been largely based on the exact solutions for spheres and ellipsoids [2][3][4][5][6]. This raises the question of whether approximating other shapes to "corresponding ellipsoids" [7] just neglects uninteresting details or whether there are crucial properties that are lost in the approximation. The demagnetizing problem in magnetic systems is a natural setting for exploring this question since it is accessible and of intrinsic importance in experiments, and constitutes a paragon for exploring the thermodynamics of long-range interacting systems [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here μ0(4π×10 −7 N/A 2 ) denotes the permeability; Ms is the saturation magnetization of Fe (1.1 ×10 6 A/m); Nxx= Nyy and Nzz denote the demagnetization factors [18], which are taken to be 0.07 and 0.85, respectively; Ks is the PMA constant of the ferromagnet, which is taken to be 1.2×10 3 J/m 2 [19]; and t denotes the thickness of the ferromagnet, 1 nm again. The energy required for switching Es is that required for charging and discharging the gate capacitors.…”
Section: Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%