2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.676501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand-Based Option Pricing

Abstract: , and the 2005 WFA Meetings. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

43
323
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
43
323
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9 All these factors result in an increase in the slope of the option supply curve when there is less liquidity, consistent with Cetin, Jarrow, Protter, and Warachka (2006). The impact of a steeper supply curve on option prices and bid-ask spreads can be understood within the theoretical model of Garleanu, Pedersen, and Poteshman (2009). Given the inventory of the dealer, a steeper supply curve would result in wider bid-ask spreads, since the difference in prices for a unit (footnote continued) relationship with price.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 All these factors result in an increase in the slope of the option supply curve when there is less liquidity, consistent with Cetin, Jarrow, Protter, and Warachka (2006). The impact of a steeper supply curve on option prices and bid-ask spreads can be understood within the theoretical model of Garleanu, Pedersen, and Poteshman (2009). Given the inventory of the dealer, a steeper supply curve would result in wider bid-ask spreads, since the difference in prices for a unit (footnote continued) relationship with price.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, option dealers face model misspecification and biased parameter estimation risk (Figlewski, 1989). These factors result in some part of the risk in options becoming unhedgeable, leading to an upward sloping supply curve (Bollen and Whaley, 2004;Jarrow and Protter, 2007;and Garleanu, Pedersen, and Poteshman, 2009). In addition, since dealers in this market are net short, they may hit their capital constraints more often if they have to sell more options to make a market (Brunnermeier and Pedersen, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1 Theorem 1 was formulated in [10] (Theorem 1) in a different form and without a formal proof. For the sake of mathematical completeness we provide a proof here.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Assume That the Utility Function U Is Of Exponentimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquidity is a complex concept standing for the ease of trading of a security. (Il)liquidity can have different sources, such as inventory risk-Stoll [15], transaction costs-Cvitanić and Karatzas [4], uncertain holding horizons-Huang [13], asymmetry of information-Gârleanu and Pedersen [9], demand pressure-Gârleanu et al [10], search friction-Duffie et al [6], stochastic supply curve-Çetin et al [3] and demand for immediacy-Grossman and Miller [12], among many others (see Amihud et al [1] for a thorough literature overview).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large negative option premium has led to the surge of empirical and analytical studies which also attempt to find the sources of this premium. See Benzoni et al (2005), Bondarenko (2003), Branger and Schlag (2008), Broadie et al (2009), Cao and Huag (2008), Constantinides et al (2009), Garleanu et al (2009), Low and Zhang (2005), Santa-Clara and Saretto (2009), and Wu (2007), among others. 3 For instance, Driessen et al (2009) relate the option risk-premium to correlation risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%