2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand responsive transport: towards the emergence of a new market segment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• operational factors (for example routeing/timetabling methods, booking methods, vehicle types-Li and Quadrifoglio 2010; Brake et al 2004;Mageean and Nelson 2003); • technological issues (relating to location plotting, fare collection and on board communication- Lacometti et al 2004); • institutional factors (to do with ownership, operation, regulation, tax, insurance and licencing these services, and how these functions are carried out- Enoch et al 2004); and • policy factors (particularly regarding availability of finance and subsidy, the objectives/ motivations behind the scheme, and decisions over eligibility criteria. For example, some DRT schemes are available to everyone, whilst others are restricted only to registered members, and/or to local, elderly, low income or mobility impaired users Cervero 1997;Hine 2004;Davison et al 2012b).…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Demand For Drtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• operational factors (for example routeing/timetabling methods, booking methods, vehicle types-Li and Quadrifoglio 2010; Brake et al 2004;Mageean and Nelson 2003); • technological issues (relating to location plotting, fare collection and on board communication- Lacometti et al 2004); • institutional factors (to do with ownership, operation, regulation, tax, insurance and licencing these services, and how these functions are carried out- Enoch et al 2004); and • policy factors (particularly regarding availability of finance and subsidy, the objectives/ motivations behind the scheme, and decisions over eligibility criteria. For example, some DRT schemes are available to everyone, whilst others are restricted only to registered members, and/or to local, elderly, low income or mobility impaired users Cervero 1997;Hine 2004;Davison et al 2012b).…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Demand For Drtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These companies had the necessary vision to understand that knowledge of the territories' dynamics constituted the basis for a greater decision support and a more assertive intervention on the network, investing in projects and specialized human resources in planning and GIS technologies (Brake et al [8]). Simultaneously, with the aim of intermodality, in the AMP, a complementary group of companies (ACE) -Intermodal Transport of Porto (TIP) was constituted, which includes road and rail operators, whose most visible actions concern the establishment of a ticketing system and a common tariff (Andante).…”
Section: (De)fragmentation Of the Network Of Public Transport And Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14] However, as was shown by the experience in Dar es Salaam, where private bus operators were banned in 1975, such action does little to address transport needs. In this case private operators continued to provide services, albeit illegally, and in 1983 they were once more allowed to provide (limited) services.…”
Section: Key Areas Of Contribution From Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%