2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEMO Active Maintenance Facility concept progress 2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neutron spectra tallies discussed above have been used in a sequence of detailed inventory simulations performed with the FISPACT-II [8] system using the EAF-2010 [12] neutronreaction cross section library and associated decay data. The material in each non-empty cell (the geometry contains many vacuum cells) of the geometry was irradiated according to the full 2-phase operation scenario envisaged for DEMO [13] under the neutron spectrum predicted for that cell. Specifically, this involved a 5.2 year phase-1 period of pulsed operation (modelled in FISPACT-II in the standard way as a continuous flux at 30% of full power), followed by a 1 year shutdown for a complete blanket and divertor replacement, and then a further 14.8 year pulsed operation in phase 2, which was split into three parts ('phases 2a-2c') with 8 month shutdown periods for additional divertor replacements in between.…”
Section: Inventory Simulations and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutron spectra tallies discussed above have been used in a sequence of detailed inventory simulations performed with the FISPACT-II [8] system using the EAF-2010 [12] neutronreaction cross section library and associated decay data. The material in each non-empty cell (the geometry contains many vacuum cells) of the geometry was irradiated according to the full 2-phase operation scenario envisaged for DEMO [13] under the neutron spectrum predicted for that cell. Specifically, this involved a 5.2 year phase-1 period of pulsed operation (modelled in FISPACT-II in the standard way as a continuous flux at 30% of full power), followed by a 1 year shutdown for a complete blanket and divertor replacement, and then a further 14.8 year pulsed operation in phase 2, which was split into three parts ('phases 2a-2c') with 8 month shutdown periods for additional divertor replacements in between.…”
Section: Inventory Simulations and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept is for an extensive facility at 737,000m 3 that is able to meet the operational demands of the maintenance program [17]. It is necessary for the AMF to provide adequate component storage areas to cope with one full set of activated components and one replacement set.…”
Section: Active Maintenance Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Active Maintenance Facility (AMF), see figure 4, has been developed to support the VMS as described in § 4. The concept is for an extensive facility at 737,000m 3 that is able to meet the operational demands of the maintenance program [17] 16 divertor maintenance ports vessel components will require active cooling for a period of up to 18 months. This allows the decay heating to reduce so that the components have a stable temperature of ~50°C without additional cooling.…”
Section: Active Maintenance Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of casks are docked to the bio-shield and vessel ports at the upper port and at the divertor port to deploy remote handling systems and to deliver and remove components. During remote maintenance operations, the Active Maintenance Facility [4] supplies and receives casks containing remote handling equipment and components from a buffer store.…”
Section: Remote Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%