Democracy Against Labor Movement: Japan’s Anti-Labor Developmental State and Aftermaths

Abstract

This paper investigates the labor-controlling orientation of the Japanese developmental state and its consequences today. Developmental state studies has given us a robust epistemological grid whereby we can make non-Western state formation intelligible. Yet, mainstream authors have tended to treat the working class as a mere appendage to state– business relations, relegating labor politics at the analysis of state– society relations. By using democratic Japan—a prime example of this sort of obfuscation—in combination with Marxian state theory, this paper outlines the difficulties, addresses them, and extends the scope of developmental state studies to labor. After identifying main tenets of the literature, the author constructs a theory of labor control as a stabilizer of relative state autonomy. The author applies this to Japanese labor movements since 1945 and interprets events and processes of labor oppression/regulation through which Japanese capitalism subsumed the working class under the aegis of the developmental state. Labor control, emerging out of an “exceptional state” (Poulantzas, 1974), evolved into a refined socio-relational system that insulated developmental goals from labor movements. This Japanese trajectory keenly mobilized big business and elite labor, which transformed labor control into a bilateral and then a tripartite league in defense of industrial policy and its deskilling/reskilling intervention. By the 1970s, this achieved the famous docility of Japanese labor. The historically constructed character of docile labor force was exploited once again when Japan made a neoliberal turn in its post-development phase.

Social norms and (de-)financialization: Japan’s and China’s divergent paths in consumer credit

“…While some scholars (e.g. Hayashi, 2020;Shibata, 2020) claim neoliberal corporate management has casualized the employment in Japan, I contend most Japanese corporate management have anti-liberal bureaucratic (not capitalistic) characteristics and have hired low-paid, easily dischargeable nonregular workers to reduce personnel costs and protect existing regular workers in lifetime employment. However, although labour is respected in Japan, I agree the exploitation of non-regular workers has been aggravated in the prolonged economic stagnation.…”

Hong Kong’s Precarious Young Workers and Contradictions of Capital

“…In this way, workers not only have to make ends meet in a highly commodified society with increasingly expensive daily subsistence, they are also forced to engage in precarious working lives and become vulnerable to job insecurity, casualization and work flexibilization in labour markets (Alberti et al, 2018; Standing, 2014). Moreover, capitalists take advantage of workers’ vulnerable position in the labour markets to exercise new surplus-value extraction strategies and impose a wide array of hybrid control over workers in the capitalist labour process (Child, 1984; Delbridge and Ezzamel, 2005; Edwards and Scullion, 1982; Hayashi, 2020; Siu, 2017; Wilkinson, 1983).…”