2001
DOI: 10.1080/13549830120052836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratic and Environmental Effects of Local Agenda 21: A comparative analysis over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second type of study attempts to perform an overall analysis of the level of implementation of Local Agenda 21, clear examples of this trend being the studies on the network of European cities EUROCITIES (Vallittu and Lehtimaki, 2001), for the Union of Cities of the Baltic (Lindstrom and Gronholm, 2002), for Australia (Whittaker, 1996) and for Italy (Avanzi, 1999), whereas others focus on specifi c stages of its execution, such as a few research projects performed in Australia (Mercer and Jotkowitz, 2000;Cuthill, 2002), the United Kingdom (Bond et al 1998), Japan (Barrett and Usui, 2002), Finland (Joas, 2000(Joas, , 2001, Sweden and Austria (Feichtinger and Pregerning, 2005) and Ireland (Kelly and Moles, 2002).…”
Section: Empirical Studies Performed By Researchersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second type of study attempts to perform an overall analysis of the level of implementation of Local Agenda 21, clear examples of this trend being the studies on the network of European cities EUROCITIES (Vallittu and Lehtimaki, 2001), for the Union of Cities of the Baltic (Lindstrom and Gronholm, 2002), for Australia (Whittaker, 1996) and for Italy (Avanzi, 1999), whereas others focus on specifi c stages of its execution, such as a few research projects performed in Australia (Mercer and Jotkowitz, 2000;Cuthill, 2002), the United Kingdom (Bond et al 1998), Japan (Barrett and Usui, 2002), Finland (Joas, 2000(Joas, , 2001, Sweden and Austria (Feichtinger and Pregerning, 2005) and Ireland (Kelly and Moles, 2002).…”
Section: Empirical Studies Performed By Researchersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the contrary, as examples of the work focused on specific phases in the development of Local Agenda 21, the following can be cited: the research by Mercer and Jotkowitz [32] and Cuthill [33] for Australia; Bond et al [7] for the United Kingdom; Barrett and Usui [34] for Japan; Joas [35] for Finland; Feichtinger and Pregernig [36] for Sweden and Austria; Kelly and Moles [37] for Ireland; and Herná ndez-Aja [38] for Spain.…”
Section: The Local Action Plan: the Path Towards Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Evans et al (2006) conducted the European research project DISCUS (Developing Institutional and Social Capacity for Sustainable Development) and found many cases where Mayors were perceived by others as entrepreneurial figures with sufficient charisma and commitment to motivate others and promote the sustainability agenda. These individuals have been given different labels such as local catalysts, frontrunners, and/or local firebrands (Mehta, 1996;Eckerberg and Forsberg, 1998;Miranda and Hordijk, 1998;Rowe, 2000;Joas and Gronholm, 2004;Barrutia et al, 2007). Several studies (qualitative and quantitative) have confirmed the prominence of key individuals in the spread of LA21 processes Echebarria, 2011, 2013b;Masnavi, 2013).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%