2013
DOI: 10.1177/0300985813498783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demodectic Mange, Dermatophilosis, and Other Parasitic and Bacterial Dermatologic Diseases in Free-Ranging White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the United States From 1975 to 2012

Abstract: The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is a common and widespread North American game species. To evaluate the incidence, clinical manifestations, demography, and pathology of bacterial and parasitic dermatologic diseases in white-tailed deer in the southeastern United States, we retrospectively evaluated white-tailed deer cases submitted to the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study from 1975 to 2012. Among 2569 deer examined, bacterial or parasitic dermatologic disease was diagnosed in 88 (3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep scrapings and a complete histopathologic evaluation are necessary for etiologic diagnosis. Different from our chamois, severe generalized alopecia associated with poor body condition and emaciation have been described in roe deer, mule deer, white-tailed deer, and black-tailed deer with demodicosis (Bildfell et al 2004;De Bosschere et al 2007;Gentes et al 2007;Nemeth et al 2014). However, similar to our chamois, less severe lesions associated with normal body condition have been reported in a mule deer and an elk (Desch et al 2010).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deep scrapings and a complete histopathologic evaluation are necessary for etiologic diagnosis. Different from our chamois, severe generalized alopecia associated with poor body condition and emaciation have been described in roe deer, mule deer, white-tailed deer, and black-tailed deer with demodicosis (Bildfell et al 2004;De Bosschere et al 2007;Gentes et al 2007;Nemeth et al 2014). However, similar to our chamois, less severe lesions associated with normal body condition have been reported in a mule deer and an elk (Desch et al 2010).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Lymphoplasmacytic perifolliculitis has been also described in black-tailed deer (Bildfell et al 2004) and roe deer (Bosschere et al 2007). Conversely, scant inflammatory cells or no inflammatory response around mite-filled follicles were observed in mule deer (Gentes et al 2007), white-tailed deer (Nemeth et al 2014), and European red deer (Izdebska et al 2013). Indeed, local immunosuppression caused by the mites and allowing them to survive in the host skin has been described (Ferrer et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disease resulting from A. chelonae infection is called dermatophilosis. Dermatophilosis has been reported in a number of vertebrates, including a variety of mammals (Aubin et al, 2016; Caron et al, 2018; Gebreyohannes, 2013; Lunn et al, 2016; Nemeth et al, 2014), birds (Scaglione et al, 2016; Shearnbochsler et al, 2018), reptiles (Hellebuyck et al, 2012; Tamukai et al, 2016; Wellehan et al, 2004) and humans (Amor et al, 2011; Aubin et al, 2016; Burd et al, 2007). This disease is an important zoonotic skin disease in domestic animals leads to significant economic losses (Ndhlovu & Masika, 2016; Shaibu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others live on the skin surface (non-burrowing mites), fur, and other sites (Hoppmann and Barron, 2007;Jimenez et al, 2010;Kahn et al, 2010;Lohse et al, 2002). Nemeth et al (2013) described lesions occurring in the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) that microscopically consisted of epidermal crusts and cutaneous nodules with mild perifollicular lymphoplasmacytic inflammation. Gamasid mites were observed in association with L. egyptiacusand P. serrata in the present study, and were attached to the epidermis and resulted in destruction of keratin layer but with no significance histopathological changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%