This article identifies and analyzes several points of similarity in the structure and context of forecasting in the social and natural sciences. These include: the limits of identities or universal laws as a basis for forecasts; the corresponding need for simplifying parametric representations of one or more of the variables that enter into identities; various sources of uncertainty about parameterizations; intrinsic limitations on predictability or forecasting accuracy in large-scale systems; the need for sensitivity analyses of model responses to changes in exogenous variables and/or parametric structures; problems of model linkage; and the social (organizational and political) context of forecasts. Suggestions for future lines of inquiry are made in each case. Several of these are such that they can benefit from a sharing of experience and expertise across disciplinary lines.Forecasting is an estimation or calculation of future events or developments, derived from a model, simple or complex, heuristic or analytic. Forecasting, to put it in Other words, pertains to the formation of expectations about future states or processes of specific historical entities (cf., Duncan, 1969;Henschel, 1976;Schuessler, 1968). Social scientists perhaps are best known and/or notorious for economic and demographic forecasts, whereas natural scientists typically are associated with and/or blamed for weather, climate, earthquake, and ecological forecasts. But each produces forecasts of many other social and natural phenomena, and there are interstitial areas, such as energy, transportation, and technological forecasting to which both have contributed.Forecasts can be made for single variables or multi-dimensional distributions at a specific time, or for time series of such variables or distributions. They can involve elaborate methodological formalism based on universal laws or identities; can be based on simple extrapolation of past performance or human judgment; or can involve some combination of lawful behavior and extrapolation and judgment--so-called "contextual laws." The "future" forecasted can be distant or near. The scope of forecasts can encompass the world's physical/social/economic systems or a single local phenomenon.The uses of forecasts range from their explanatory value in a scientific sense to their fulfullment of a statutory requirement for practical policy uses.Many of the dangers and pitfalls to which forecasts are subject are discussed in this work. These include intrinsic limits on their accuracy; the sources and impacts of errors in forecasts; the dangers of spurious accuracy and of a false sense of precision; the danger that certain forecasts, when taken seriously, can create their own self-fulfilling prophecy; and the potential conflicts of interest among forecasters and/or users of forecasts.Despite the presence of these and other problems in forecasting, there are, of course, many potential benefits. Not least of these is the possibility that forecasts of important variables can be correct! Moreover, eve...