2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01287.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic Assessment of a Marbled Murrelet Population from Capture‐Recapture Data

Abstract: Population size is a fundamental variable of interest in most conservation programs, as are the demographic processes underlying variation in numbers. The Marbled Murrelet (  Brachyramphus marmoratus ) is a seabird nesting in coastal old‐growth forest in North America and is at the heart of a controversy concerning forest management. Despite the urgent need for a careful assessment of the demographic state of populations, the species is so secretive that its life history is poorly known and reliable estimates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted annual survival probability for marbled murrelets from allometric and comparative methods was 0.835–0.845 (Beissinger , Beissinger and Peery ). These predictions were confirmed with field studies in California ( Ŝ = 0.868–0.896; Peery et al ) and British Columbia ( Ŝ = 0.829–0.929; Cam et al ) using similar mark–recapture methods as used in our study. For further comparison, at Triangle Island off the coast of British Columbia, apparent annual survival of rhinoceros auklets ( Cerorhinca monocerata ) was similar ( Ŝ = 0.86), whereas that of tufted puffins ( Fratercula cirrhata ) was markedly higher ( Ŝ = 0.91–0.96); in contrast, annual survival of Cassin's auklets ( Ptychoramphus aleuticus ) was lower ( Ŝ = 0.75–0.84), especially in years with extreme climate events ( Ŝ = 0.44 for females; Morrison et al ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The predicted annual survival probability for marbled murrelets from allometric and comparative methods was 0.835–0.845 (Beissinger , Beissinger and Peery ). These predictions were confirmed with field studies in California ( Ŝ = 0.868–0.896; Peery et al ) and British Columbia ( Ŝ = 0.829–0.929; Cam et al ) using similar mark–recapture methods as used in our study. For further comparison, at Triangle Island off the coast of British Columbia, apparent annual survival of rhinoceros auklets ( Cerorhinca monocerata ) was similar ( Ŝ = 0.86), whereas that of tufted puffins ( Fratercula cirrhata ) was markedly higher ( Ŝ = 0.91–0.96); in contrast, annual survival of Cassin's auklets ( Ptychoramphus aleuticus ) was lower ( Ŝ = 0.75–0.84), especially in years with extreme climate events ( Ŝ = 0.44 for females; Morrison et al ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Estimating demographic rates for endangered species can be especially problematic because such species tend to be, by definition, rare. Recovery efforts on behalf of endangered species can also generate substantial public and political controversy, particularly when they involve consideration of socioeconomic or ethical issues in addition to biological ones (Cam et al 2003). The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina (Xantus de Vesey, 1860)) and island gray fox (Urocyon littoralis (Baird, 1857)) are two well-known examples of endangered species that have generated controversy, in these cases, either through perceived economic costs to local resource-based communities (Franklin et al 2000) or by proposed control of naturally occurring predators (Courchamp et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant population declines have been suspected in portions of Alaska since the early 1990s, including Glacier Bay and Icy Strait in southeast Alaska (Piatt et al 2007), but no population trend data are available for the Port Snettisham area. If reproduction in southeast Alaska is depressed compared with historical levels, as is suspected for murrelets nesting in California and British Columbia (Cam et al 2003), investigations into the causes of low reproductive success at Port Snettisham, as well as at other sites in this core breeding region, are needed to further elucidate the mechanisms that are limiting murrelet recruitment. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sustained low recruitment, primarily from low reproductive rates, has been considered the key factor limiting population sizes of murrelets in the southern portion of their breeding range (Cam et al 2003. Suspected causes of low recruitment are mostly related to anthropogenic factors, such as increased rates of nest predation associated with habitat modification (Marzluff et al 2000, Malt andLank 2009), and reduced food availability and diet quality, possibly related to fishing practices and climate change (Becker and Beissinger 2006, Becker et al 2007, Ronconi and Burger 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%