This paper incorporates the aging population projected by the U.S. Social Security Administration to a heterogeneous-agent OLG model with idiosyncratic wage shocks and analyzes its effects on individual households, the government budget, and the overall economy. The fiscal gap caused by the demographic change is 2.94% of GDP under the intermediate projection. The effect of the aging population is large by itself and depends significantly on how the government finances the cost of the demographic change.There is a strong trade-off between efficiency and equity, and this paper quantitatively assesses the pros and cons of stylized fiscal reform plans.JEL Classification Numbers: D91, E62, H31.without the aging population, if the government increases marginal income tax rates proportionally; but GDP per capita will increase modestly by 1.7% in 2039 and 3.1% in the long run if the government instead decreases Social Security benefits proportionally. Cutting Social Security benefits looks better than raising marginal income tax rates in terms of its effects on output. However, the welfare results indicate that households in the current generation-those aged 21 and older at the time of the policy change-strongly prefer increasing marginal income tax rates to cutting Social Security benefits, at the expense of households in the future. If the government cares about the level of future output and the inter-generational equity at the same time, it is probably safe to consider one of the following options: (1) raising the flat consumption tax to balance the budget each year, and (2) cutting Social Security benefits and raising payroll tax rates proportionally roughly on 50-50 basis instead. As the fiscal gap generated by the demographic changes increases over time, delaying the policy reform (by increasing the government debt) is not desirable in terms of both the economic output and the intergenerational equity.Needless to say, this is not the first paper that incorporates the U.S. aging population into a generalequilibrium OLG model and analyzes its macroeconomic and welfare effects. Relative to the previous literature, however, the present paper has a variety of strengths in the model economy and calibration procedure.To the best of my knowlege, Auerbach and Kotlikoff (1987) are the first to incorporate the historical and predicted changes in the fertility rate to a large-scale deterministic general-equilibrium OLG model. Kotlikoff, Smetters, and Walliser (2007) incorporate the U.S. demographic changes to their 12-incomelevel deterministic general-equilibrium OLG model. Ludwig, Schelkle, and Vogel (2012) also incorporate the U.S. demographic changes to their deterministic general-equilibrium OLG model with human capital accumulation. The present paper conducts the similar exercises in a heterogeneous-agent OLG economy with idiosyncratic wage shocks and mortality shocks, so that the model can capture not only the intergenerational redistribution effect of the government fiscal policy but also its intra-generational redistr...