Demographic Differences in Emergency Room Epistaxis Treatment Patterns and Outcomes

Abstract

ObjectiveInvestigate the association between demographic characteristics and emergency department (ED) epistaxis management and outcomes.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingTriNetX US collaborative database.MethodsAdults presenting to the ED for epistaxis were retrospectively followed for 7 days. Spanish‐speaking patients were propensity score matched to English‐speaking patients by demographics and medical history. Outcomes included use of nasal decongestant, nasal packing or cautery, diagnostic nasal endoscopy, endoscopic control of hemorrhage, hospital admission, and mortality. The analysis was also performed with stratification by race and ethnicity.ResultsSpanish‐speaking patients were less likely to receive nasal packing or cautery [odds ratio, OR: 0.78; 95% confidence interval, CI: (0.68; 0.90)] or diagnostic nasal endoscopy [OR: 0.72; 95% CI: (0.52; 0.98)] compared to English‐speaking patients. Black patients were more likely to receive treatment with a nasal decongestant spray [OR: 1.31; 95% CI: (1.27, 1.36)], but less likely to receive any other treatment compared to White patients. Asian patients were less likely to undergo nasal packing or cautery [OR: 0.90; 95% CI: (0.82; 0.99)], but had more ED visits [(1.37; 1.32) P < .01] compared to White patients. Hispanic patients were less likely to be admitted [OR: 0.93; 95% CI: (0.87; 0.98)], and averaged fewer ED visits [(1.27; 1.30) P = <.0001] compared to non‐Hispanic patients.ConclusionWhile demographic trends in ED epistaxis management are nuanced, our results suggest that Spanish‐speaking, Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients are less likely to receive diagnostic and epistaxis control procedures. Additional research is needed to determine the etiology of these differences.