2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-020-03010-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic Discrepancies in Prenatal Urine Drug Screening in Washington State Surrounding Recreational Marijuana Legalization and Accessibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 State prenatal urine drug screening requirements have changed as a result of recreational cannabis legalization. 37 Fear of punitive action-particularly among those who have had a positive toxicology screening result during pregnancy or at the time of delivery-may have caused women to be less likely to report use when asked retrospectively. Therefore, we hypothesized that women in states where recreational cannabis is legal may have been more aware of risks of prenatal cannabis use (eg, possible involvement of child protective services, adverse health effects) than women in states that had not legalized recreational use, resulting in substantial underreporting of prenatal cannabis use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35,36 State prenatal urine drug screening requirements have changed as a result of recreational cannabis legalization. 37 Fear of punitive action-particularly among those who have had a positive toxicology screening result during pregnancy or at the time of delivery-may have caused women to be less likely to report use when asked retrospectively. Therefore, we hypothesized that women in states where recreational cannabis is legal may have been more aware of risks of prenatal cannabis use (eg, possible involvement of child protective services, adverse health effects) than women in states that had not legalized recreational use, resulting in substantial underreporting of prenatal cannabis use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, women residing in states where recreational cannabis is illegal have poor or uncertain knowledge of the risks associated with cannabis use during pregnancy . State prenatal urine drug screening requirements have changed as a result of recreational cannabis legalization . Fear of punitive action—particularly among those who have had a positive toxicology screening result during pregnancy or at the time of delivery—may have caused women to be less likely to report use when asked retrospectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perlman and colleagues have also found that Indigenous women are also far more likely to be screened than their white counterparts (aOR: 4.43, 95% CI: 1.88–10.43) (Perlman et al, 2020). These disparities persist even in areas where recreational cannabis use is legal, such as Washington State, where African American, Latinx and Asian women are screened more frequently than white women (Pflugeisen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inequities beyond race and ethnicity include where someone lives, income, insurance type and maternal age and education. Women who deliver in hospitals with larger percentages of Medicaid recipients, women who are using subsidized insurance, young, unmarried and less educated mothers are more likely to be tested for substance use (Patel et al, 2021; Pflugeisen et al, 2020; Rebbe et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,22 Yet, Black compared with White individuals are substantially more likely to undergo UDS and to have their opioids discontinued in response. [23][24][25][26] As UDS is increasingly incorporated into cancer care, 20,27,28 guidelines regarding triggers or the optimal frequency for testing are lacking. This could amplify racial biases in UDS, yet little is known about the prevalence or inequities in UDS among cancer populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%