2006
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[546:dpahvo]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic Patterns and Harvest Vulnerability of Chronic Wasting Disease Infected White-Tailed Deer in Wisconsin

Abstract: Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a fatal disease of white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) caused by transmissible protease‐resistant prions. Since the discovery of CWD in southern Wisconsin in 2001, more than 20,000 deer have been removed from a >2,500‐km2 disease eradication zone surrounding the three initial cases. Nearly all deer removed were tested for CWD infection and sex, age, and harvest location were recorded. Our analysis used data from a 310‐km2 core study area where disease prevalence was high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
131
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
131
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumes that probabilities of samples from the various strata entering the surveillance stream from other jurisdictions are similar to those we reported and that the effects and epidemiologic patterns of CWD are relatively constant between regions and across species, which seem reasonable, based on published observations (Miller et al, 2000;Miller and Wild, 2004;Miller and Conner, 2005;Joly et al, 2006;Grear et al, 2006) and on similarities between the weight values independently estimated for mule deer (Table 1) and for elk (D. Walsh, unpubl. data) using data from Colorado.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This assumes that probabilities of samples from the various strata entering the surveillance stream from other jurisdictions are similar to those we reported and that the effects and epidemiologic patterns of CWD are relatively constant between regions and across species, which seem reasonable, based on published observations (Miller et al, 2000;Miller and Wild, 2004;Miller and Conner, 2005;Joly et al, 2006;Grear et al, 2006) and on similarities between the weight values independently estimated for mule deer (Table 1) and for elk (D. Walsh, unpubl. data) using data from Colorado.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…comm. ), in white-tailed deer in Wisconsin (Grear et al, 2005), and in wapiti in northcentral Colorado (Miller and Conner, unpubl. ), suggesting that common transmission mechanisms and contact structures among the three natural host species may drive epidemic dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous analyses (Miller et al, 2000;Grear et al, 2005), we constructed four biologically reasonable models: Two models in which sex was either additive with ln(age) or multiplicative with ln(age) represented ''threshold'' models in which prevalence rose and then plateaued (Grear et al, 2005), and two models in which sex was either additive with age and age 2 or multiplicative with age and age 2 represented ''humped'' models in which prevalence rose and then declined (Miller et al, 2000). We compared these four models to a ''constant'' model in which prevalence remained unchanged across age groups; this last model represented a null model.…”
Section: Demographic Patterns From Cementum Annuli Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outbreak is west of Madison, WI and is centered in western Dane and eastern Iowa counties (Grear et al 2006, Joly et al 2006. We focused data collection and analysis within the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WIDNR) designated 'western core area' which was 210 sections (544 km 2 ) and generally encompassed the areas of highest CWD prevalence (Joly et al 2006) in the outbreak.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%