2011
DOI: 10.9783/9780812204209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonic Desires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before discussing the various sources, it is important to note that as far as the rabbinical court is concerned, the problem arises, among others, because statistics show that the amount of spousal support women are awarded in civil court is higher than what the rabbinical courts award, and it is also tied to the consumer price index, contrary to the prevailing position in rabbinical court. 102 Another relevant issue is that the civil courts award spousal support even in cases in which the rabbinical court is likely to hold that no spousal support should be awarded at all, 103 or that it should not be imposed because of insufcient evidence in the court's opinion, 104 or that the obligation to pay spousal support can be terminated earlier than according to the civil court. 105 It is easy to understand that there might be a halakhic problem in imposing payments on the husband that according to halakha he is not obligated to pay at all, or in amounts exceeding the amounts that he would pay according to halakha.…”
Section: Women's Spousal Support In Civil Courtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before discussing the various sources, it is important to note that as far as the rabbinical court is concerned, the problem arises, among others, because statistics show that the amount of spousal support women are awarded in civil court is higher than what the rabbinical courts award, and it is also tied to the consumer price index, contrary to the prevailing position in rabbinical court. 102 Another relevant issue is that the civil courts award spousal support even in cases in which the rabbinical court is likely to hold that no spousal support should be awarded at all, 103 or that it should not be imposed because of insufcient evidence in the court's opinion, 104 or that the obligation to pay spousal support can be terminated earlier than according to the civil court. 105 It is easy to understand that there might be a halakhic problem in imposing payments on the husband that according to halakha he is not obligated to pay at all, or in amounts exceeding the amounts that he would pay according to halakha.…”
Section: Women's Spousal Support In Civil Courtmentioning
confidence: 99%