2019
DOI: 10.1177/0361198119859321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstrating Transit Schedule Benefits with a Dedicated Short-Range Communication-Based Connected Vehicle System

Abstract: A vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) connected vehicle system was installed along Redwood Road in Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, in November 2017 using dedicated short-range communication (DSRC) radios to connect transit buses to traffic signals. One of the goals of this system was to improve the schedule reliability of the bus by providing signal priority at traffic signals when the bus is behind its published schedule by a certain threshold. Data for the analysis were obtained from the DSRC communications… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent field implementation and study of CV-equipped buses along the Redwood Road corridor in Salt Lake County, UT, showed that the equipped buses that requested priority met their schedules 2%-6% more frequently than other buses. This field test also proved the reliability of that DSRC communication (Leonard et al, 2019). Other recent studies used traffic simulation to evaluate TSP effects in a CV environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent field implementation and study of CV-equipped buses along the Redwood Road corridor in Salt Lake County, UT, showed that the equipped buses that requested priority met their schedules 2%-6% more frequently than other buses. This field test also proved the reliability of that DSRC communication (Leonard et al, 2019). Other recent studies used traffic simulation to evaluate TSP effects in a CV environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Due to the negative effects on the side-streets, BRT with unconditional TSP has not been considered for this study (Al-Deek et al 2017). Furthermore, it is assumed that for the future BRT operations UDOT and UTA will implement conditional CV-based TSP, according to the current field tests (Leonard et al, 2019). The 2025 CV BRT TSP model included BRT operations, CV-equipped buses and 3level custom conditional TSP strategies.…”
Section: CV Brt Tsp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though this TSP system is the most advanced so far, the position from where the vehicles are sending their position to request priority is the same for all vehicles, and fixed on a geofenced limit around a signalized intersection of about 1,000 ft. This system also uses the Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System (MMITSS) application to exchange information, such as schedule adherence and the number of passengers on board, in the way that complies with the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J2735-2016 standard (22,23). Using the data available from this corridor, Lenard at al., found that busses equipped with CV technologies and using the TSP strategy follow their published schedule about 2%-6% more frequently than vehicles without the particular equipment (23).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TSP software for this deployment was based on the Multi-modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System (MMITSS) developed for the Connected Vehicle (CV) Pooled Fund Study. It was adapted to match Utah’s needs and is referred to as MMITSS-UT ( 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After implementing TSP in November 2017, researchers determined that equipped buses were on time 3% more often than non-equipped buses ( 2 , 3 ). Optimization was then needed to further improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the operation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%