2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.070502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of Channel Multiplexing Quantum Communication Exploiting Entangled Sideband Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13.8 dB squeezed vacuum states with 20.2 dB anti‐squeezing are produced by OPOs, [ 39 ] where the semi‐monolithic single‐resonant standing wave cavity is formed by a piezo‐actuated concave mirror and the back surface of a periodically poled KTiOPO4$_{4}$ (PPKTP) crystal with a dimension of 1 mm ×$\times$ 2 mm×$\times$ 10 mm. [ 40 ] In addition, to verify the universality of the squeezing gate reported here, one has to create the input states located at arbitrary location of the phase space, and this is realized by modulating the fundamental beam at 3 MHz sideband frequency using electro‐optical phase and amplitude modulators. Notice that all the relative phases, including those in the beam interference and homodyne detection, are actively stabilized during the measurement cycle in order to suppress the noise coupling of anti‐squeezing as much as possible.…”
Section: Quantum Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13.8 dB squeezed vacuum states with 20.2 dB anti‐squeezing are produced by OPOs, [ 39 ] where the semi‐monolithic single‐resonant standing wave cavity is formed by a piezo‐actuated concave mirror and the back surface of a periodically poled KTiOPO4$_{4}$ (PPKTP) crystal with a dimension of 1 mm ×$\times$ 2 mm×$\times$ 10 mm. [ 40 ] In addition, to verify the universality of the squeezing gate reported here, one has to create the input states located at arbitrary location of the phase space, and this is realized by modulating the fundamental beam at 3 MHz sideband frequency using electro‐optical phase and amplitude modulators. Notice that all the relative phases, including those in the beam interference and homodyne detection, are actively stabilized during the measurement cycle in order to suppress the noise coupling of anti‐squeezing as much as possible.…”
Section: Quantum Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, on the other hand, we chose 𝑡 𝑟 = 𝑇 2 𝑡 𝑐 𝑇 2 𝑡 𝑐 +𝑇 1 𝑟 𝑐 , the cross talk will be eliminated from the second mode, but not from the first one. It is easy to see, that if 𝑇 1 = 𝑇 2 ≡ 𝑇, (22) and ( 23)…”
Section: Cross Talk Compensation By Optical Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantageously, CV entanglement can be deterministically generated reaching two-mode squeezing bellow −10𝑑𝐵 (corresponds to logarithmic negativity up to 𝐿𝑁 = 4.3) [18]. In CV quantum communication, one of the possible ways to simultaneously transfer many entangled states during the same period of time is to use frequency or spatial multiplexing of quantum states residing in different modes [19][20][21][22]. Such an approach was in particular used to improve quantum communication with multiplexed QKD [23] or with multiplexed quantum teleportation using frequency pulse modes [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the improvements of utilizing high-efficiency quantum interface and suitable bandwidth in communication channels, a multiplexing scheme of quantum memories in space [19,20], time [21] or frequencies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] can further allow a higher communication capacity of entanglement in respective continuous spaces, leading to a multimode quantum information processing [30][31][32]. This is in contrast to the system using finite and discrete degrees of freedom, where paths, polarization, or orbital angular momenta can be employed for entanglement generation [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%