2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13312-014-0310-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demystifying LMS and BCPE methods of centile estimation for growth and other health parameters

Abstract: Lambda-Mu-Sigma and Box-Cox Power Exponential are popular methods for constructing centile curves but are difficult to understand for medical professionals. As a result, the methods are used by experts only. Non-experts use software as a blackbox that can lead to wrong curves. This article explains these methods in a simple non-mathematical language so that medical professionals can use them correctly and confidently.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using height, weight, age and sex data for each individual, WHZs were calculated using the age-, sex-and indicator-specific lambda-musigma values from the 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards 10,57 . The lambda-musigma methodology allows for Gaussian z score calculations and comparisons to be applied to skewed, non-Gaussian distributions 58 . A child was classified as overweight or wasted if their weight-for-height/length was more than two s.d.…”
Section: Data Surveys and Child Anthropometry Data We Extracted Indmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using height, weight, age and sex data for each individual, WHZs were calculated using the age-, sex-and indicator-specific lambda-musigma values from the 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards 10,57 . The lambda-musigma methodology allows for Gaussian z score calculations and comparisons to be applied to skewed, non-Gaussian distributions 58 . A child was classified as overweight or wasted if their weight-for-height/length was more than two s.d.…”
Section: Data Surveys and Child Anthropometry Data We Extracted Indmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major statistical challenges involve making these curves: finding different percentiles at each age and achieving smoothness of the estimated percentile curves over age (9). For percentile estimation at each age group, the approach taken by others involves statistical modeling using methods such as generalized linear modeling or generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (10) to estimate the parameters of a predefined probability distribution thought to best describe the data and from this estimate derive the percentiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each age group distribution, we directly calculated the cumulative distribution function and compared these to fitted standard distributions (Figures 1F,G) (1, 2, 913). Gaussian and Logistic estimates were derived using regression based on maximum likelihood estimates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centile curves were constructed for each sex between the ages of 0–29 years using Generalized Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape ( GAMLSS )(Rigby and Stasinopoulos, 2005). For height weight and BMI, ages up to 29 were included to anchor curves and avoid edge effects (Indrayan, 2014). For weight-for-height, ages up to 20 were included, and dummy cases with values below the lowest height measurement were added to weight-for-height models to reduce edge effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%