fragile X syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with a broad range of neural phenotypes. Interpreting these findings has proven challenging because some phenotypes may reflect compensatory mechanisms or normal forms of plasticity differentially engaged by experiential differences. To help minimize compensatory and experiential influences, we used an ex vivo approach to study network dynamics and plasticity of cortical microcircuits. in Fmr1 −/y circuits, the spatiotemporal structure of Up-states was less reproducible, suggesting alterations in the plasticity mechanisms governing network activity. chronic optical stimulation revealed normal homeostatic plasticity of Up-states, however, Fmr1 −/y circuits exhibited abnormal experience-dependent plasticity as they did not adapt to chronically presented temporal patterns in an interval-specific manner. These results, suggest that while homeostatic plasticity is normal, Fmr1 −/y circuits exhibit deficits in the ability to orchestrate multiple forms of synaptic plasticity and to adapt to sensory patterns in an experience-dependent manner-which is likely to contribute to learning deficits. Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the leading monogenic cause of autism and intellectual disabilities, and reflects loss of function mutations in the RNA binding protein, Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP) 1-4. Since the generation of the first mouse model of FXS 5 , a large number of neural phenotypes have been associated with the syndrome including: abnormalities in dendritic spine morphology and stabilization 6-12 , altered shortand long-term forms of synaptic plasticity 13-20 , abnormal axonal development 19,21,22 , changes in interneuronal connectivity 23,24 , channelopathies 16,25-31 , and imbalanced excitation/inhibition 24,32-44. The sheer diversity of reported neural phenotypes highlights the challenge in determining which phenotypes are a primary consequence of the absence of FMRP, from those that reflect indirect secondary neural phenotypes. These secondary neural phenotypes could reflect: (1) compensatory and homeostatic mechanisms, i.e., genetic redundancy and homeostatic plasticity engaged to compensate for the primary consequences of the lack of FMRP 44-46 ; or (2) normal forms of plasticity shaped by experiential differences, including differences in sensory exploration, social interactions and maternal care. Indeed, it is increasingly recognized that some of the neural phenotypes reported in animal models of FXS and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may reflect compensatory mechanisms or differential developmental experiences 44,45. For example, it is well established that early differences in sensory experience, social interactions and maternal rearing, can alter numerous neural properties throughout life 47-53. As a result of decreased social interactions, young FMRP-deficient animals could in effect inhabit an impoverished sensory environment. Indeed, it is also well established that in mouse models of FXS and ASD, animals experience differences in so...